[2019] KEHC 6733 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 6733 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution's evidence, both oral and documentary, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused was required to be placed on his defence to answer the charge. The decision was based on the standard set out in Section 306 of the Criminal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 6733 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ibrahim Kamau Irungu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 7 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Outcome
accused placed on his defence
Judges
AM Cockar
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case Case to Answer Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Ibrahim Kamau Irungu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution's evidence, both oral and documentary, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused was required to be placed on his defence to answer the charge. The decision was based on the standard set out in Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that if a prima facie case is made out at the close of the prosecution's case, the accused must be called upon to defend himself.

Court Disposition

accused placed on his defence

Orders

  • The accused is placed on his defence to answer the charge.