[2023] KEHC 3611 (KLR)
The court found that the transfer of the case from Hon J.M Kituku to Hon G.O Kimanga was not done in accordance with the law, specifically section 200(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which requires procedural compliance and reasons for transfer in partly heard matters. The subsequent proceedings conducted by Hon...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3611 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Said Juma Iddi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E200 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Procedural Irregularity Before Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for revision allowed; proceedings from November 29, 2021, expunged; case to proceed before original magistrate.
- Judges
- SM Githinji
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Cases, Procedural Irregularity, Criminal Trial Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Said Juma Iddi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Procedural Irregularity Before Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of the case from one magistrate to another was done in accordance with the law.
- 2 Whether the proceedings conducted by the subsequent magistrate were valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the transfer of the case from Hon J.M Kituku to Hon G.O Kimanga was not done in accordance with the law, specifically section 200(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which requires procedural compliance and reasons for transfer in partly heard matters. The subsequent proceedings conducted by Hon G.O Kimanga, including placing the accused on his defence and hearing the defence case, were therefore irregular and unlawful. To remedy the situation and ensure compliance with the law, the court ordered that all proceedings from November 29, 2021, recorded by Hon G.O Kimanga, be expunged from the record. The file is to be placed before Hon J.M Kituku to continue the hearing...
Court Disposition
Application for revision allowed; proceedings from November 29, 2021, expunged; case to proceed before original magistrate.
Orders
- All proceedings from November 29, 2021, recorded by Hon G.O Kimanga – SRM, are expunged from the record.
- The file shall be placed before Hon J.M Kituku – SPM to continue with the hearing from the point reached on October 27, 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Republic v Iddi (Criminal Revision E200 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3611 (KLR) (26 April 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3611 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Malindi
Criminal Revision E200 of 2022
SM Githinji, J
April 26, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Said Juma Iddi
Respondent
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 286 of 2018 of the Magistrate’s Court at Kilifi)
Ruling
1. This matter was referred to this court by Hon J.M Kituku, SPM Kilifi Magistrate’s Court. The said magistrate had heard the matter up to the point of closure of the prosecution’s case. On October 27, 2021 parties were directed to file submissions and a mention date given of November 29, 2021.
2. On November 29, 2021 it is not clear why the file was not placed before the trial magistrate as it was dealt with by Hon G.O Kimanga – SRM. Though the said subsequent magistrate was not in conduct of the matter, he simply went ahead and found that the accused person had a case to answer and accordingly placed him on his defence. Defence hearing was done on February 28, 2022 and a judgement date was given of March 21, 2022. The matter is therefore pending judgment.
3. Hon J.M Kituku – SPM who had the previous conduct of the matter is still in Kilifi Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court. Transfer of cases from one judicial officer to another is done procedurally under the law and for given reasons. It does not change hands or picked by judicial officers as they may desire. When properly done, for partly heard matters, section 200 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code should be strictly complied with. What happened in this case is a big surprise, unwarranted and totally against the law. As such, for purposes of compliance with the law, the option left is to expunge the unprocedural hearing from the date of November 29, 2021, recorded by Hon G.O Kimanga – SRM, and have the file placed before Hon J.M Kituku – SPM, to continue regularly with the hearing from the point reached on October 27, 2021.
This court’s so directs on review.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023…………………………………………………S.M. GITHINJIJUDGE