[2013] KEHC 5704 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5704 (KLR)

The court found that the United Democratic Forum party had the authority to prepare and submit its nomination list for special interest seats, and Muslima Dida was confirmed as number one on that list. The IEBC acted within its mandate in considering and dismissing the applicant's complaint, as the party list was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5704 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Muslima Dida; Interested Party: United Democratic Forum; Applicant: Beatrice Nyaboke Oisebe
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 215 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Party Nominations, Electoral Disputes, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Administrative Law Party Nominations Electoral Disputes Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Muslima Dida

Respondent

United Democratic Forum

Interested Party

Beatrice Nyaboke Oisebe

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the nomination of Muslima Dida as the special interest nominee for Kisii County was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the United Democratic Forum party list was properly constituted and submitted.
  3. 3 Whether the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission acted within its mandate in dismissing the applicant's complaint.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the United Democratic Forum party had the authority to prepare and submit its nomination list for special interest seats, and Muslima Dida was confirmed as number one on that list. The IEBC acted within its mandate in considering and dismissing the applicant's complaint, as the party list was properly constituted and submitted. There was no legal basis to impugn the IEBC's decision or the nomination process. The application was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.