[2024] KEHC 15071 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15071 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to quash Gazette Notice No. 13544 Vol. CXXV - No. 221 dated 6th October 2023 because the notice was published pursuant to a valid and unchallenged High Court order. The doctrine of finality and res judicata applied, precluding the High Court from revisiting or overturning...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15071 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: The Chief Executive Officer, Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission; Respondent: The Selection Panel For The Recruitment Of Nominees Of Appointment As Chairperson And Members Of The IEBC; Interested Party: Mandera County Assembly
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 153 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
JM Chigiti
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Jurisdiction of High Court, Gazettement of Nominees, Doctrine of Res Judicata, Finality of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Judicial Review Jurisdiction of High Court Gazettement of Nominees Doctrine of Res Judicata Finality of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

The Chief Executive Officer, Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission

Respondent

The Selection Panel For The Recruitment Of Nominees Of Appointment As Chairperson And Members Of The IEBC

Respondent

Mandera County Assembly

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to quash Gazette Notice No. 13544 Vol. CXXV - No. 221 dated 6th October 2023 published pursuant to a court order.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, and declaration against the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to quash Gazette Notice No. 13544 Vol. CXXV - No. 221 dated 6th October 2023 because the notice was published pursuant to a valid and unchallenged High Court order. The doctrine of finality and res judicata applied, precluding the High Court from revisiting or overturning its own or a concurrent court's orders. The court emphasized that only the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to interfere with such orders. The applicant's attempt to challenge the implementation of the Gazette Notice through judicial review was therefore misconceived, as the High Court Judicial Review Division cannot sit on appeal over another High Court's decision or orders....

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs to the respondents and interested party.