[2013] KEHC 5636 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5636 (KLR)

The court found that the applications and petitions lacked merit because the original nomination list submitted by URP to IEBC within the statutory period did not include Jane Cheperenger Ingo, and Irene Kimutai Chesang’ was properly listed. The court held that the decision as to who appears on the party list is a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5636 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Cheperenger Ingo; Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Nomination Dispute Resolution Committee); Respondent: Irene Chemutai Chesang; Petitioner: Ali Mohammed Osman; Respondent: United Republican Party; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Irene Kimutai Chesang’; Petitioner: Susan Chepkosgei Ndiema
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 216 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
applications and petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Party Nominations, Electoral Disputes, Nomination Lists, Jurisdiction of Electoral Bodies
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Administrative Law Party Nominations Electoral Disputes Nomination Lists Jurisdiction of Electoral Bodies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Cheperenger Ingo

Applicant

Republic

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Nomination Dispute Resolution Committee)

Respondent

Irene Chemutai Chesang

Respondent

Ali Mohammed Osman

Petitioner

United Republican Party

Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Irene Kimutai Chesang’

Respondent

Susan Chepkosgei Ndiema

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the inclusion of Irene Kimutai Chesang’ on the URP gender top up list was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the IEBC Dispute Resolution Committee erred in dismissing the complaints regarding the nomination list.
  3. 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to intervene in party nomination decisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applications and petitions lacked merit because the original nomination list submitted by URP to IEBC within the statutory period did not include Jane Cheperenger Ingo, and Irene Kimutai Chesang’ was properly listed. The court held that the decision as to who appears on the party list is a matter for the party and not for judicial intervention, unless there is a clear breach of law, which was not established in this case. The IEBC Dispute Resolution Committee acted within its mandate and on the basis of the material before it. The court further noted that URP was entitled to only one nomination slot, and the membership disputes raised were not germane to the...

Court Disposition

applications and petitions dismissed

Orders

  • The petitions and applications are dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.