[2013] KEHC 5622 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 5622 (KLR)

The court found that the record of proceedings and the decision did not indicate that the Commissioner with a potential conflict of interest had recused himself from the IEBC Dispute Resolution Committee. The absence of such evidence undermined the integrity and impartiality of the decision-making process. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 5622 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Applicant: United Republican Party; Applicant: The Speaker, Baringo County Assembly; Applicant: Julius L. Lekosek Laisoi; Applicant: Rodgers Kiptoo Mutai; Applicant: Jennifer Nariamut Koipiri; Applicant: Juliana Siayon Letangule; Applicant: Stella Kalegeno; Applicant: Risper Kimaiyo Jebichi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 198 & 199 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
decisions set aside and matter remitted for fresh hearing
Legal Topics
Electoral Dispute Resolution, Conflict of Interest, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Election Petitions Electoral Dispute Resolution Conflict of Interest Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

United Republican Party

Applicant

The Speaker, Baringo County Assembly

Applicant

Julius L. Lekosek Laisoi

Applicant

Rodgers Kiptoo Mutai

Applicant

Jennifer Nariamut Koipiri

Applicant

Juliana Siayon Letangule

Applicant

Stella Kalegeno

Applicant

Risper Kimaiyo Jebichi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the participation or potential conflict of interest of a Commissioner in the IEBC Dispute Resolution Committee vitiated the proceedings and decision.
  2. 2 Whether the recusal of the Commissioner was properly recorded and effected.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the record of proceedings and the decision did not indicate that the Commissioner with a potential conflict of interest had recused himself from the IEBC Dispute Resolution Committee. The absence of such evidence undermined the integrity and impartiality of the decision-making process. The court held that, in the interests of justice and to uphold the principles of fair administrative action and natural justice, the decisions in the affected complaints must be set aside. The court further directed that the complaints be heard afresh by a differently constituted committee, excluding the Commissioner in question, and that the determination be made within a specified...

Court Disposition

decisions set aside and matter remitted for fresh hearing

Orders

  • The decisions in Complaint No. IEBC/NDRC/PL/215/2013 and IEBC/NDRC/PL/216/2013 are set aside.
  • The complaints shall be heard before a differently constituted Committee of the IEBC excluding Commissioner Letangule.