[2013] KEHC 5598 (KLR)
The court found that the 2nd respondent, whose interests would be adversely affected by any determination, was not served and did not participate in the proceedings. The court emphasized the cardinal principle of natural justice that no party should be condemned unheard. As the 2nd respondent was not given an...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5598 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Fatuma Mohamed Ali; Respondent: NARC Kenya; Applicant: Muhubo Omar Ahmed
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review 203 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Natural Justice, Party Nominations, Electoral Disputes, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Fatuma Mohamed Ali
Respondent
NARC Kenya
Respondent
Muhubo Omar Ahmed
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the nomination of the 2nd respondent as gender top up nominee for Garissa County was lawful.
- 2 Whether the 2nd respondent was properly served and given an opportunity to be heard.
- 3 Whether the decision of the 1st respondent should be quashed for alleged fraud and procedural impropriety.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 2nd respondent, whose interests would be adversely affected by any determination, was not served and did not participate in the proceedings. The court emphasized the cardinal principle of natural justice that no party should be condemned unheard. As the 2nd respondent was not given an opportunity to present her side, the court held that it could not make a determination on the merits of the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed for failure to serve the 2nd respondent, with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
JR. CASE NO 203 OF 2013
REPUBLIC ……………………………….................…………..…………………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL &
BOUNDARIES COMMISSION ……….………..……......……….1ST RESPONDENT
FATUMA MOHAMED ALI ……………………….…………......……..………. 2ND RESPONDENT
NARC KENYA ……………………..………………………....………..……… 3RD RESPONDENT
Ex-Parte...............................................................................................MUHUBO OMAR AHMED
JUDGMENT
The applicant has brought this matter to challenge the nomination of the 2nd respondent, whom she alleges is an Administration Police Officer, as the gender top up nominee for Garissa County for NARC Kenya, the 3rd respondent. She contends that she was the only nominee submitted by the 3rd respondent to the 1st respondent on 30th April 2013.
According to the applicant, the 2nd respondent fraudulently and with intention to deceive uttered a false document, namely a letter dated 24th April 2013, purporting it to have been authored by the 3rd respondent, nominating herself as the nominee for the gender top up seat.
She states that the party protested to the 1st respondent through letters dated 6th and 21st May 2013 which the 1st respondent disregarded; that she filed a complaint, IEBC/DRC/PL/203/2013, but the 1st respondent also disregarded the allegations of fraud and dismissed her complaint.
The 1st respondent case is that it received a list dated 23rd January 2013 and a consolidated list dated 19th April 2013; that while considering the list, it received a letter from the 3rd respondent dated 24th April 2013 indicating that the applicant should be replaced by the 2nd respondent, but on 6th May 2013, it received another letter from the 3rd respondent indicating that it should nominate the applicant.
It contends that in light of the contradictory instructions from the Party, it included both the applicant and the 2nd respondent, and upon consideration, the 2nd respondent emerged best, hence her nomination.
The 3rd respondent, through its executive officer, Mr. Taabu Omia Wanga, supported the position of the applicant. Mr. Wanga stated that the party had sent its list dated 30th April 2013 to the 1st respondent on 2nd May 2013; that it had nominated the applicant as No. 6 in the gender top up list; that it had never nominated the 2nd respondent; and it asserts that the letter dated 24th April 2013 allegedly emanating from the party is a forgery. The 3rd respondent therefore asks the court to quash the decision of the 1st respondent made on 7th June 2013 in complaint No IEBC/DRC/PL/49/2013.
Determination
This matter raises serious issues against the 2nd respondent, and any determination of the matter would adversely affect her interests. However, the 2nd respondent did not participate in these proceedings as she was never served. In the affidavit of service sworn by Daniel Kanyiri Watu, an appointed court process server, on 28th June 2013, he states at paragraph 10 thereof that he was unable to trace and serve the 2nd respondent.
It is a cardinal principle of natural justice that no party shall be condemned unheard. To make a decision in this matter in the absence of the 2nd respondent may well result in her being condemned without having had a chance to present her side of the matter.
In the circumstances, this application must fail. It is hereby dismissed but with no order as to costs.
Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 12th day of July 2013
MUMBI NGUGI D. S. MAJANJA WELDON KORIR
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE