[2020] KEHC 1236 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 1236 (KLR)

The Court found that the application was procedurally incompetent because it was not supported by a statement as required by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Additionally, the failure to join Rachel Wanjiru, a party likely to be affected by the proceedings, rendered the application defective. The Court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 1236 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Inspector General; Applicant: Francis Ng'ang'a Mbuggua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E064 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave Application
Outcome
Application struck out for being incompetently filed.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Procedural Incompetence
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Procedural Incompetence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Inspector General

Respondent

Francis Ng'ang'a Mbuggua

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave Application

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to apply for an order of mandamus is competent in light of procedural requirements.
  2. 2 Whether failure to join a necessary party renders the application defective.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of a supporting statement as required by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules invalidates the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the application was procedurally incompetent because it was not supported by a statement as required by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Additionally, the failure to join Rachel Wanjiru, a party likely to be affected by the proceedings, rendered the application defective. The Court emphasized that compliance with procedural rules is mandatory in judicial review proceedings, and non-compliance cannot be overlooked. Consequently, the application was struck out for being incompetently filed.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for being incompetently filed.

Orders

  • The Applicant's Chamber Summons dated 17th November 2020 is hereby struck out for being incompetently filed.
  • There shall be no order as to costs.