[2009] KEHC 2009 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter after the prosecution reduced the charge from murder, was entitled to have his mitigation considered. The circumstances showed provocation and lack of premeditation. The accused was a first offender, sickly, HIV positive, and the sole...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2009 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Isaya Onyango Were
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 27 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- accused set free; non-custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargain, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Provocation, First Offender
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Isaya Onyango Were
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully killed the deceased, constituting manslaughter.
- 2 Whether the circumstances and mitigation justify a non-custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter after the prosecution reduced the charge from murder, was entitled to have his mitigation considered. The circumstances showed provocation and lack of premeditation. The accused was a first offender, sickly, HIV positive, and the sole breadwinner for his family, with two young children left in the care of others. He had already served three years in custody. The court determined that a further custodial sentence would not serve the interests of justice, given the time already served and the mitigating factors. Accordingly, the accused was set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
accused set free; non-custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- The accused is hereby set free and shall be at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
Criminal Case 27 of 2006
REPUBLIC...................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ISAYA ONYANGO WERE...................................................ACCUSED
S E N T E N C E
The accused was charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The accused pleaded not guilty to the charge. The prosecution reduced the charge to manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code. The accused pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter.
The particulars of the offence are that:
“on the 3rd day of February, 2006 at Lusheya village, Musanda Location, Butere/Mumias District of Western Province, the accused unlawfully killed PHILISTER ASIGO WERE.”
On the 3rd February, 2006 at about 8. 00 p.m. the accused was in his bedroom with the deceased who was his wife. The accused asked his wife whether she had given their sick child medicine but the deceased responded very rudely and threw the child to the accused. The accused got annoyed and hit the deceased who fell and hit her head on a stool. The accused together with the deceased’s sister assisted the deceased and kept her on the bed and she slept. The accused slept on the floor. Unfortunately the deceased passed away at about 10. 00 p.m. A Post Mortem report by Dr. Hellen Koech opined that the cause of death was due to internal bleeding secondary to ruptured spleen from blunt abdominal trauma.
The accused was arrested at his home the same night. Mrs. Muleshe, Counsel for the accused, in mitigation submitted that the accused has two young school going children who were left with good Samaritans. The accused is sickly and suffers from H.I.V. and needs proper diet. The accused was provoked and is the sole bread winner whose parents depend on him. The accused is remorseful and is a first offender. He has been in custody for three years.
I have considered the mitigation by counsel for the accused and I also note the circumstances under which the offence took place. The accused is a first offender and is sickly. He has two children to take care of. A custodial sentence will not serve any purpose noting that the accused has been in custody since February, 2006. The accused is hereby set free and shall be at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Delivered, dated and signed at Kakamega this 24th day of September, 2009.
SAID J. CHITEMBWE
J U D G E