[2022] KEHC 3299 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through its witnesses to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with the law. The decision is based on the standard that, at the close of the prosecution's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 3299 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Thomas Itemere
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 43 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Thomas Itemere
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused sufficient to require him to be put on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through its witnesses to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with the law. The decision is based on the standard that, at the close of the prosecution's case, if there is evidence upon which a reasonable tribunal could convict, the accused must be called upon to answer the case.
Court Disposition
The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused, Thomas Itemere, is found to have a case to answer and is hereby put on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
Republic v Itemere (Criminal Case 43 of 2014) [2022] KEHC 3299 (KLR) (8 July 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 3299 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Criminal Case 43 of 2014
WM Musyoka, J
July 8, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Thomas Itemere
Accused
Ruling
1. From reading the material on record and having heard the two witnesses presented, I am persuaded that the Prosecution has adduced evidence which establishes a prima facie case, upon which the accused person should be put on his defence. I find that he has a case to answer.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY 2022W M MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Erick Zalo, Court Assistant.Thomas Itemere, the accused, in personMs. Kagai, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecution, for the Republic