[2024] KEHC 1113 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 1113 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution, having called 8 witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused, Chai Jabiri, for the murder of Maurice Tembo. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence. The court therefore ruled that the accused has a case to answer and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 1113 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Chai Jabiri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E032 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Outcome
Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to be put on his defence.
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, No Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case No Case to Answer Criminal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Chai Jabiri

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution is sufficient to require the accused to answer to the charge of murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution, having called 8 witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused, Chai Jabiri, for the murder of Maurice Tembo. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence. The court therefore ruled that the accused has a case to answer and should proceed to defend himself against the charge of murder as provided under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to be put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is found to have a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
  • Mention scheduled for 26th February 2024 to fix a date for hearing.