[2023] KEHC 17341 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, though largely circumstantial, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against all the accused. Eyewitness testimony placed the accused at the scene and described their participation in the assault. The autopsy confirmed death by blunt force trauma, consistent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17341 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Faith Jadi; Defendant: Wesley Samuel; Defendant: Peter Gichimu Kiarie Alias Muhimu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 49 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Have a Case to Answer (section 306(2) Cpc)
- Outcome
- All accused persons placed on their defence.
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Identification Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence, Prima Facie Case
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Faith Jadi
Defendant
Wesley Samuel
Defendant
Peter Gichimu Kiarie Alias Muhimu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Have a Case to Answer (section 306(2) Cpc)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being placed on their defence.
- 2 Whether the identification of the accused as perpetrators was positive and reliable.
- 3 Whether the cause of death was sufficiently linked to the accused persons.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, though largely circumstantial, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against all the accused. Eyewitness testimony placed the accused at the scene and described their participation in the assault. The autopsy confirmed death by blunt force trauma, consistent with the alleged assault. The court, applying the principles from Bhatt v Republic and R v Kipkering arap Koske, held that the evidence required a rebuttal from the accused. Accordingly, all accused were placed on their defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
All accused persons placed on their defence.
Orders
- All accused persons are hereby placed on their defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
Republic v Jadi & 2 others (Criminal Case 49 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 17341 (KLR) (Crim) (11 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17341 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Criminal
Criminal Case 49 of 2018
K Kimondo, J
May 11, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Faith Jadi
1st Accused
Wesley Samuel
2nd Accused
Peter Gichimu Kiarie Alias Muhimu
3rd Accused
Ruling
1. The three accused persons are charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars are that on the night of September 2, 2018 at Dam village, Mountain View Area, Dagoretti Sub-County within Nairobi County jointly with others not before the court, murdered Dominic Nambili Isaya.
3. They all pleaded not guilty. The prosecution called ten witnesses.
4. Learned counsel for the accused lodged submissions dated April 17, 2023 together with a list of authorities. Those by the learned Prosecution Counsel are dated February 20, 2023.
5. Learned counsel for the accused submitted that the deceased was attacked by a mob inside an establishment styled Texas Bar. Counsel concedes that the accused were in the bar, but he contends that they were not positively identified as the assailants; and, that the identification parade conducted by Chief Inspector Kamama (PW8) was a mere sham. He argued further that the body was recovered in a dam far away from the bar. In his view, no one can tell for certain what caused the death.
6. But according to the prosecution, the totality of the evidence of the ten witnesses has established a case sufficient to place all the accused on their defence.
7. My view is as follows. According to Ronald Mambili (PW1) and Brian Irako (PW2), the 1st accused (who was an employee at the bar) hit the deceased with a beer bottle on the back of the head; and, that the 2nd and 3rd accused intervened or participated in assaulting the deceased using fists and kicks.
8. The body of the deceased was found floating in the dam on September 6, 2018. The scene was processed and the remains removed to the City Mortuary. According to the pathologist (PW5) the body had been in the water for long and had decomposed. The autopsy report (exhibit 1) concludes that the deceased died from “head injury due to blunt force trauma”.
9. The prosecution’s case is founded largely on circumstantial evidence. But upon the digest of the evidence of all the ten witnesses; and, cognizant of the precedents in Bhatt v Republic [1957] EA 332 andR v Kipkering arap Koske & another 16 EACA 135 (1949), I find that the Republic has established aprima facie case calling for a rebuttal from all the accused.
10. Accordingly, under the provisions of section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I hereby place all the accused persons on their defence.It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 11TH DAY OF MAY 2023. KANYI KIMONDOJUDGERuling read virtually on Microsoft Teams in the presence of: -Mr Masara for the accused persons instructed by Masara & Company Advocates.Ms Kigira for the respondent instructed by the office of the Director of Public prosecutions.Mr. E. Ombuna, Court Assistant.