[2021] KEHC 7723 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented to deny the accused bail, as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution. The pre-bail probation report was not adverse, the prosecution did not oppose the application, and the victim's family had forgiven the accused. However, given the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 7723 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Wambua Muuo alias Kasee; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 42 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bail granted with conditions
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons, Murder Charge, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Wambua Muuo alias Kasee
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons presented to deny the accused bail, as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution. The pre-bail probation report was not adverse, the prosecution did not oppose the application, and the victim's family had forgiven the accused. However, given the seriousness of the offence (murder), the court determined that the terms of bail should be commensurate with the gravity of the charge. Accordingly, the accused was granted bond with a substantial surety requirement and a condition not to interfere with prosecution witnesses.
Court Disposition
bail granted with conditions
Orders
- James Wambua Muuo alias Kasee is granted bond pending trial of Kshs. 500,000 with one surety of like sum.
- The accused shall not interfere with the prosecution’s witness.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KIAMBU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 42 OF 2020
REPUBLIC.........................................................................PROSECUTOR
VS.
JAMES WAMBUA MUUO Alias KASEE................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. This is a ruling of the notice of motion application dated 16th November, 2020. The application is filed by JAMES WAMBUA MUUOalias KASEE(accused). The accused by that application seeks his release on bail pending his trial for the offence of murder.
2. I have considered the pre-bail probation report, on the accused. That report shows that accused is a 22 year old man. He resided with his father in Kikuyu who works as a Labourer in that area. The victim’s family confirm that the deceased and the accused were good friends. The victim’s family has forgiven the accused.
3. The application for bail was not opposed by prosecution and the pre-bail probation report is also not adverse to the accused being released on bail pending his trial. Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution requires an arrested person to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions unless there are compelling reasons not to be released. What can amount to being a compelling reason was considered in the case of REPUBLIC VS. FRANCIS KIMATHI (2017) eKLR thus:-
“I have considered this application. Needless to state that, by dint of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, all offences are bailable. More specifically, Article 49 (1) (h) thereof provides that an arrested person has the right to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released. There may not be a scientific measure of what exactly amounts to compelling reasons as that would depend on the circumstances of each case. Except, however, compelling reason should be a reason or reasons which is rousing, strong, interests attention, and brings conviction upon the court that the accused person should be denied bail. Flimsy reasons will not therefore do. Therefore, the standard is high for it draws from the constitutional philosophy that any restriction of rights and freedoms of persons must be sufficiently justified given the robust Bill of rights enshrined in the Constitution. I need not aver-emphasize these matters except to cite the case of R vs.JOKTAN MAYENDE & 3 OTHERS[2013] eKLR.”
4. Even though there are no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail, the offence that accused faces is a serious offence and the terms of bail, in such a case ought to be commensurate to the offence.
DISPOSITION
5. I grant the following orders:-
(a) James Wambua MuuoaliasKasee is granted bond pending his trial of Kshs.500,000/= with one surety of like sum.
(b) The accused shall not interfere with the prosecution’s witness.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Coram:
C/A : Kevin
Accused: …………………………….. Irungu
For the Accused………………………Mr. Kasyoka
For the Prosecution………………………….
COURT
Ruling delivered virtually.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE