[2016] KEHC 1896 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail pending trial. The pre-bail probation report was favourable, indicating the accused's good character and family support. The prosecution did not oppose bail but requested reasonable terms. Applying Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 1896 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 12 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bail granted
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for a charge of murder.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bail as required under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail pending trial. The pre-bail probation report was favourable, indicating the accused's good character and family support. The prosecution did not oppose bail but requested reasonable terms. Applying Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution and the definition of compelling reasons from case law, the court concluded that the accused is entitled to bail and granted her a personal bond of Kshs.500,000 with two sureties of similar amount.
Court Disposition
bail granted
Orders
- The accused Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi is granted a personal bond of Kshs.500,000 with two sureties of similar amount.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 12 OF 2016
REPUBLIC ………………………… PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
JANET MWARI M’NGARUTHI ………. ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused JANET MWARI M’NGARUTHI is awaiting trial for a charge of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. She has now sought before this court for bail pending trial.
2. To assist this court determine the application for bail pending trial the court requested for pre-bail probation report. That report is now before the court. The report described the accused as a person of good character with no previous convictions. However, the accused mother who was interviewed by the probation officer stated that the accused is an alcoholic. She however said that the accused does not abuse any other substance. The accused family is otherwise very favourable to her being released on bail pending trial. Her mother and brothers have undertaken to meet the bond/bail terms. The probation report is indeed very favourable to the accused being granted bail.
3. The Principal Prosecuting Counsel Mr Tanui did not oppose the application save that he requested that the court will grant reasonable terms of bail considering that the accused is facing a charge of murder.
4. Article 49(1)(h) provides that an arrested person has the right to be released on bail on reasonable conditions pending trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released. Justice Stella Mutuku in the case of REPUBLIC vs MOHAMED HAGAR ABDIRAHIM & ANOTHER (2012) eKLR considered the meaning of compelling reasons and formulated the following definition:-
“A compelling reason would be such a reason that is forcefully convincing to persuade this court to believe that something is true.”
5. Bearing that definition in mind, I find that this is a case where there is no compelling reason to deny the accused bail pending trial. In that view I grant Janet Mwari M’ngaruthi personal bond of Kshs.500,000 with two sureties of similar amount.
6. It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 9th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
CORAM:
Before Justice Mary Kasango
Court Assistant – Njue
Accused: Janet Mwari M’Ngaruthi …………………….
For the State: ….....................................
COURT
Ruling delivered in open court.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE