[2018] KEHC 8064 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused, Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi, for the offence of murder. The evidence presented by the nine prosecution witnesses was deemed sufficient such that, if uncontroverted, it could result in a conviction. Consequently, the court ruled...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8064 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 12 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution's Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make her defence.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case to require the accused to be put on her defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused, Janet Mwari M'Ngaruthi, for the offence of murder. The evidence presented by the nine prosecution witnesses was deemed sufficient such that, if uncontroverted, it could result in a conviction. Consequently, the court ruled that the accused had a case to answer and was required to be put on her defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make her defence.
Orders
- The accused is informed of her right to address the court, give evidence, make an unsworn statement, or call witnesses in her defence as per Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 12 OF 2016
REPUBLIC..................................PROSECUTOR
Versus
JANET MWARI M’NGARUTHI.......ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused JANET MWARI M’NGARUTHIwas charged with the offence of murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty.
2. The prosecution has called nine (9) witnesses and concluded submitting its evidence and closed its case. This calls upon this court to consider whether the accused has a case to answer as provided under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code Cap 75. In the case REPUBLIC – V- JOSEPH SHITANDI & ANOTHER [2014] eKLR the prosecution having closed its case the Judge in considering whether the accused had a case to answer stated:
“A case to answer is a case where if the accused keeps quiet, the evidence of the prosecution should be such that a conviction will result.”
At the close of the prosecution’s case, therefore, the court if it finds that the prosecution’s evidence could not lead to a conviction, then the accused should be acquitted. If however the court finds that the prosecution’s evidence suffices then the accused will be called to defend himself.
3. In this case I am satisfied that the evidence of the prosecution does suffice for the accused to be called upon to defend himself. Accordingly as per Section 306 (2) of Cap 75 the accused is informed that he has a right to address the court, either personally or by his advocate and to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence. The accused is now called upon to make his election on how he shall present his defence.
Dated and Delivered at Nanyuki this 28th February 2018
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Coram
Before Justice Mary Kasango
Court Assistant: Njue/Mariastella
Accused: Janet Mwari M’ngaruthi
For accused………………………………
For state: ………………………………
Language …………………………………
COURT
Ruling delivered in open court
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE