[2022] KEHC 17040 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 17040 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution, having called 12 witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused persons. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence for the charge of murder under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The court was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 17040 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Mwenyeheri Mgele Jeffa; Defendant: Shadrack Nyiro Rasi; Defendant: Bernard Masai Mwangeka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E014 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Outcome
The accused persons have a case to answer and are put on their defence.
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Murder Charge, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Charge Prima Facie Case Criminal Procedure Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Mwenyeheri Mgele Jeffa

Defendant

Shadrack Nyiro Rasi

Defendant

Bernard Masai Mwangeka

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being put on their defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution is sufficient to require the accused to answer to the charge of murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution, having called 12 witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused persons. The evidence presented was sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence for the charge of murder under Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The court was satisfied that the threshold for a case to answer had been met, and accordingly, the accused persons were called upon to defend themselves.

Court Disposition

The accused persons have a case to answer and are put on their defence.

Orders

  • The accused persons are found to have a case to answer.
  • Defence hearing scheduled for 20th February 2023.