[2019] KEHC 11410 (KLR)
The court found that, despite the accused's remorse, guilty plea, and difficult personal circumstances, the seriousness of the offence—causing the death of an 18-year-old through a single stab wound—warranted a custodial sentence. The court considered the mitigating factors, including the accused's time in custody...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 11410 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Jerida Anindo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 2 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
- Outcome
- accused sentenced to five years imprisonment from date of arraignment
- Judges
- AM Cockar
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargaining, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, Custodial Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Jerida Anindo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should receive a custodial or non-custodial sentence for manslaughter.
- 2 What mitigating and aggravating factors should influence the sentence imposed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, despite the accused's remorse, guilty plea, and difficult personal circumstances, the seriousness of the offence—causing the death of an 18-year-old through a single stab wound—warranted a custodial sentence. The court considered the mitigating factors, including the accused's time in custody (2.5 years), her young age, her status as an orphan and mother, and her efforts at rehabilitation. However, the court determined that a non-custodial sentence would not adequately reflect the gravity of the offence or serve as a deterrent. The court emphasized that personal hardships do not excuse or justify taking another's life and that young people must learn to walk away...
Court Disposition
accused sentenced to five years imprisonment from date of arraignment
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to five years imprisonment from 12th January 2017.
- The accused must attend guidance and counselling sessions organized by Prison.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 2 OF 2017
LESIIT, J
REPUBLIC...............PROSECUTOR
-VERSUS -
JERIDA ANINDO...........ACCUSED
RULING ON SENTENCE
1. The accused JERIDA ANINDO was charged with one count of murder contrary to section 203 of the Penal Code. The charge was reduced to that of manslaughter contrary to section 202 of the Penal Code following a successful Plea Bargaining and Plea Agreement.
2. The sentence for the offence of manslaughter is provided under section 205 of the Penal Code. That section provides that a person convicted of manslaughter faces a life sentence.
3. I have considered that the accused was arraigned in court on 12th January 2017 and has been in custody during the pendency of her case since then. I have also considered that the accused pleaded guilty to the offence.
4. I have considered the submissions on accused mitigating circumstances as given by her counsel, Mrs. Omungala. I have considered that the accused is 28 years old and a mother of a 10 year old boy who is being taken care of by her grandmother. I have considered defence counsels’ submission that the accused is remorseful for the offence and that she has reformed. The various certificates for the various courses that she has attended while in prison custody have also been noted. She pleads for leniency and for a non-custodial sentence.
5. I called for a Pre-Sentence Report and one has been filed. The families of both the deceased and the accused were interviewed. The family of the accused pleaded for leniency and gave background information about the accused circumstances including the fact she was raised in hardship.
6. The family of the deceased, the parents and siblings are yet to come to terms with the death of the deceased. He was 18 years old and a form 2 student when he met his death.
7. The accused has admitted that she caused the death of the deceased and blames it on her anger which she pledges to learn to control.
8. In addition to the above, I appreciate that the accused has pleaded guilty to the lesser charge thus saving court’s time. The accused has been in custody since 12th January 2017 a period of 2½ years now.
9. I have taken into account the circumstances of the offence. The accused reacted to deceased questioning her why she had called his mother to abuse her. The accused pulled out a knife she was carrying in her belongings and stabbed the deceased once. I considered it was a single stab and that she aimed for the thigh. Deceased died of excessive bleeding in the second hospital where he had been taken for treatment.
10. The accused is said to be an orphan and a mother of one. I considered accused personal circumstances. She has had a difficult life, being moved from one relatives home to another. From her relative’s sentiments to the Probation Officer, she has not been known to be violent and they blamed her life experiences for her reaction and action in this case.
11. One’s past experiences cannot be an excuse nor a justification for murder. I repeat here what I have said before. Young people must appreciate that it is cool to walk away without trying to revenge for oneself particularly where one has been rejected.
12. Having taken all these factors into account, I consider that a non-custodial sentence will not be appropriate. The accused needs to understand the seriousness of her action. The deceased was a very young person. She should have been protective or condescending to him as a mother. Furthermore the deceased was not aggressive at all. Accused reaction was unwarranted.
13. Having taken into account all these factors I sentence the accused to five years imprisonment from date of arraignment in court. She must also attend guidance and counselling sessions to be organized by Prison.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2019.
LESIIT J
JUDGE