[2019] KEHC 9336 (KLR)
The court found that the ex-parte applicant had attached the necessary certificate of costs in the supplementary affidavit, thereby ascertaining the amount due. Since the County Government of Busia, as successor to the Busia Municipal Council, inherited its liabilities, and given that attachment of government...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 9336 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Applicant: Joe Kirwa Tanui t/a Rotalink Engineering Co. Ltd; Respondent: County Government of Busia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 106 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Leave to Apply for Writ of Mandamus
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Leave granted to apply for writ of mandamus.
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Writ of Mandamus, Government Liability, Decretal Sum Enforcement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Joe Kirwa Tanui t/a Rotalink Engineering Co. Ltd
Applicant
County Government of Busia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Leave to Apply for Writ of Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex-parte applicant is entitled to leave to apply for a writ of mandamus to compel the County Government of Busia to settle the decretal sum.
- 2 Whether the absence of a certificate of costs invalidates the application for leave.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ex-parte applicant had attached the necessary certificate of costs in the supplementary affidavit, thereby ascertaining the amount due. Since the County Government of Busia, as successor to the Busia Municipal Council, inherited its liabilities, and given that attachment of government property or arrest of its officers is not tenable, the applicant was entitled to seek a writ of mandamus. The only opposition raised was the absence of the certificate of costs, which was resolved by its production. The court therefore granted leave to the applicant to file for a writ of mandamus to compel payment of the decretal sum, costs, and interest.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Leave granted to apply for writ of mandamus.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the ex-parte applicant to file for a writ of mandamus compelling the County Government of Busia to settle the decretal sum of Ksh.1,739,990 plus costs and interest.
- Costs of this application and the main suit to be met by the County Government of Busia.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BUSIA
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 106 OF 2017
REPUBLIC..................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
JOE KIRWA TANUI T/A ROTALINK
ENGINEERING CO. LTD...................................EX-PARTE APPLICANT
AND
COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF BUSIA..................INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
1. The ex-parte applicant moved the court by way of ex-parte chamber summons under Order 53 Rules 1(1), (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya. He is seeking the following orders:
a) That leave be granted ex-parte Applicant enabling him to file for a writ of mandamus – compelling the Interested Party – the County Government of Busia, to settle the decretal sum of Ksh.1,739,990/= plus costs and interest thereof within a specified period.
b) That costs of this application and of the main suit be met by the County Government of Busia.
2. The application is premised on the following grounds:
a) That the ex-parte applicant a registered company was contracted by the then Busia Municipal council to renovate their slaughter house after a successful bid and upon a letter of award of tender issued to it.
b) That the ex-parte applicant carried out the works to completion and a certificate of practical completion was issued by the council on 16th April 2012.
c) The Interested Party upon the coming into existence as the County Government of Busia did replace the Municipal Council of Busia, the judgement Debtor in respect of the original suit; it statutorily inherited assets and liabilities of the defendant Busia Municipal Council.
d) That an Order compelling the County Government to pay would be appropriate in the circumstances of this case, as attachment of Government property and or arrest of its officers has been rendered untenable.
3. The application was opposed by the interested party on the following grounds:
a) That the applicant did not attach a certificate of costs.
b) That therefore, the claim has not been ascertained.
4. I have perused the supporting affidavit to the application and the supplementary affidavit sworn by the counsel for the ex-parte applicant and the replying affidavit sworn by Nicodemus Onyango Mulaku for the interested party. The following facts emerge:
a) A copy of certificate of costs is attached to the supplementary affidavit.
b) The interested party had opposed the application for non-availability of the certificate of costs.
5. Since there was no other ground for opposition, and having satisfied myself that the certificate of costs was attached, I will allow the application and grant leave to the ex-parte Applicant to file for a writ of mandamus compelling the Interested Party, to settle the decretal sum of Ksh.1,739,990/= plus costs and interest thereof. The costs of this application and in the main suit be met by the County Government of Busia, the interested party.
DELIVEREDandSIGNEDatBUSIA this 28thdayof February, 2019
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE