[2009] KEHC 2643 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 2643 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused, meaning that there was sufficient evidence on record which, if uncontradicted, would warrant a conviction. Consequently, the accused was called upon to make his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 2643 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Joel Nderitu Mihang’o
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 7 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Outcome
Accused placed on his defence.
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, No Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Defence Election
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case No Case to Answer Criminal Procedure Defence Election

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Joel Nderitu Mihang’o

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused, meaning that there was sufficient evidence on record which, if uncontradicted, would warrant a conviction. Consequently, the accused was called upon to make his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court reminded the accused of his right to elect the manner of his defence and to call witnesses if he so wished.

Court Disposition

Accused placed on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is placed on his defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  • The accused is called upon to elect whether to make a sworn statement, unsworn statement, or remain silent, and is reminded of his right to call witnesses.