[2016] KEHC 7540 (KLR)
The court, after considering the evidence of key prosecution witnesses and being guided by established legal principles, found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. The court determined that the evidence was sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 7540 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Defendant: John Henry Alubale Omuliebi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 49 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused put on his defence.
- Judges
- J Wakiaga
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
John Henry Alubale Omuliebi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to require him to make his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced meets the threshold under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, after considering the evidence of key prosecution witnesses and being guided by established legal principles, found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused. The court determined that the evidence was sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court refrained from detailed analysis of the evidence at this stage to avoid prejudicing the defence, as cautioned by appellate authority. Accordingly, the accused was ordered to proceed with his defence.
Court Disposition
Accused put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused shall, through his advocate, choose how he intends to defend himself.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO 49 OF 2013
REPUBLIC..............................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
JOHN HENRY ALUBALE OMULIEBI..........................ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused JOHN HENRY ALUBALE OMULIEBI pleaded not guilty to the charge of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code the particulars of which were that on the 7th day of April, 2013 at Huruma Madoga in Nairobi County murdered ALLAN EZIANU MUGAZIA.
2. To prove its case, the prosecution called a total of Nine (9) witnesses and at the close of the prosecution case, the accused through his advocate on record and the state through the prosecuting counsel opted not to make a submission on whether the accused had a case to answer and left it upon the court to make a ruling thereon.
3. At this stage the court is only required through the principles as stated in REPUBLIC Vs JAGGIVA M. PATEL & OTHERS (1) TLR (R) 85 as follows:-
“All the court has to decide at the close of the evidence in support of the charge is whether a case is made out against the accused just sufficiently to require him to make his defence……”
4. Being alive to the principle expressed by the Court of Appeal in ANTHONY NJUE NJERU vs REPUBLIC CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2006 that too much detailed an analysis of the evidence at the stage of no case to answer stage is undesirable, if the court is going to put the accused to his defence as too much details in the trial court’s ruling could then compromise the evidentiary quality of the defence to be mounted and having looked at the evidence of PW1 ROSE NJOKI NJOROGE, PW2 DAVID KEYA NYANGWESO, PW6 FREDRICK OTIENO JUMA and PW8 DR. ODUOR JOHANSEN, I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established by the prosecution to enable the accused be placed on his defence in accordance with the provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
5. The accused person shall therefore through the legal advice of his advocate on record choose how he intends to defend himself and it is so ordered.
DATED, DELIVERED and SIGNED at Nairobi this 23rd day of March, 2016.
.......................
J. WAKIAGA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mr. Mwenda for the state
M/s Odembo for the accused
Accused present
Tabitha court clerk