[2021] KEHC 3878 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, through the testimony of five witnesses, established that the accused was seen assaulting the deceased, who later died from his injuries. The evidence included eyewitness accounts and medical evidence of head injuries. Applying the principles from Bhatt v Republic and R v...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 3878 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: John Maina Mucheru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Murang'a
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 32 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer (section 306(2) Cpc)
- Outcome
- accused placed on his defence
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
John Maina Mucheru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer (section 306(2) Cpc)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case to require the accused to be put on his defence for the charge of murder.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses is sufficient at this stage to sustain the charge.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, through the testimony of five witnesses, established that the accused was seen assaulting the deceased, who later died from his injuries. The evidence included eyewitness accounts and medical evidence of head injuries. Applying the principles from Bhatt v Republic and R v Kipkering arap Koske, the court determined that a prima facie case had been made out against the accused. Consequently, the accused was placed on his defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the evidence was sufficient at this stage to require an answer from the accused.
Court Disposition
accused placed on his defence
Orders
- The accused is placed on his defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MURANG’A
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 32 OF 2012
[FORMERLY NYERI HCCR NO. 6 OF 2012]
REPUBLIC..…..............................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
JOHN MAINA MUCHERU................................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars are that on 30th December 2011 at Gatabua village, Kangari Sub-Location, Kangari Location within Muran’ga County, he murdered Joseph Ng’ang’a Mucheru.
3. He pleaded notguilty. The prosecution managed to call five witnesses.
4. Learned counsel for the accused filed submissions on 3rd May 2021. The Republic did not lodge its submissions.
5. I have paid heed to the evidence of the key witnesses. For instance PW1 testified that on the material night, he saw the accused beating up the deceased or hitting him with an object. He and others helped to ferry the deceased to Kigumo Health Centre. He said that the deceased had some visible head injuries.
6. PW2 is a sister of the accused and the deceased. When she, PW3 and PW4 went to the scene, albeit separately, they found the deceased bleeding from the forehead and unable to talk.
7. The deceased was transferred from Kigumo Health Centre to Murang’a Hospital and ultimately to Kenyatta National Hospital where he died on 4th January 2012.
8. The accused was arrested at his home on 1st January 2012 by Police Seargeant Karani (PW5) and another officer. At the time, the complaint related to assault.
9. Applying the precedents in Bhatt v Republic [1957] E.A. 332 and R v Kipkering arap Koske & another 16 EACA 135 (1949); and, upon the digest of the evidence of all the fivewitnesses, I find that the Republic has established a prima facie case against the accused.
10. Accordingly, under the provisions of section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I place the accused on his defence.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MURANG’A this 23rd day of September 2021.
KANYI KIMONDO
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of:
The accused.
Mr. S. Kirubi for the accused.
Ms. A. Gakumu for the Republic.
Ms. Dorcas Waichuhi & Ms. Susan Waiganjo, Court Assistants.