[2006] KEHC 1165 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant, a young man, had already served four years of a seven-year sentence for simple robbery, had been beaten by members of the public after the offence, and the stolen property was immediately recovered. Considering these mitigating factors and the appellant's efforts at...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1165 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Republic; Respondent: John Mwangi Muiruri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 44 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Judges
- FI Koome
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Sentencing, Appeal on Sentence, Reduction of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Appellant
John Mwangi Muiruri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of seven years imprisonment for simple robbery was excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the period already served and the appellant's rehabilitation justified reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant, a young man, had already served four years of a seven-year sentence for simple robbery, had been beaten by members of the public after the offence, and the stolen property was immediately recovered. Considering these mitigating factors and the appellant's efforts at rehabilitation, the court held that the period already served constituted adequate punishment. The sentence was therefore reduced to the period served, and the appellant was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is reduced to the period already served.
- The appellant is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 44 of 2003
[From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 1732 of 2002 in the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nakuru Mrs. S. Muketi – S.R.M. ]
REPUBLIC……………………………….............……………..……….APPELLANT
VERSUS
JOHN MWANGI MUIRURI……..............…….…………………..…RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
The appellant was initially charged with the charge of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. After a full trial, the appellant was convicted of a lesser charge of simple robbery and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment.
The particulars of the charge stated that on the 12th day of September, 2002 at Christ the King Church in Nakuru District of the Rift Valley Province i.e. jointly with others not before Court robbed Moses Oluoch Olango of a mobile phone valued at Kshs.6,000/= Siemens A-35, an umbrella valued at Kshs.200/= a wallet all valued at Kshs.6,700/= and at or immediately before or immediately after the time of such robbery threatened to use actual violence on the said Moses Oluoch Olango.
Although the grounds of appeal raised in the petition of appeal challenge the conviction, during the hearing of this appeal the appellant indicted to this court that he was only appealing against the sentence and the grounds that the appellant put forward was that he has been in custody and prison since he was incarcerated for four years. Within the said period he has undertaken a vocation training in tailoring and he prayed that the sentence be reduced so that he can contribute to the society having reformed.
This appeal was opposed by the learned Senior State Counsel Mr. Koech on behalf of the state.
I have therefore considered the evidence on record, the circumstances of the appellant who is a very young man, and the fact that after the robbery he was beaten up by members of the public and the stolen mobile phone for the complainant was recovered immediately. Moreover out of the sentence of seven (7) years the appellant has served a period of four years. I consider it to be adequate punishment and I hereby reduce the sentence and commute the same to the period whereby served.
The appeal is hereby allowed and unless the appellant is otherwise lawfully held, he is set at liberty in regard to the conviction and sentence in this matter.
It is so ordered.
Judgement read and signed at Nakuru in 9th day of August, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE
9. 8.2006
Before: M. Koome – Judge
Gumo for the State
Mwiti: Court Clerk
Appellant present
Judgement read and signed in Nakuru this 9th day of August, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE