[2020] KEHC 501 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 501 (KLR)

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the ex parte Applicant’s Chamber Summons because the dispute concerned the use and occupation of business premises, a matter reserved for the Environment and Land Court under the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 501 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Jonah H Kariuki t/a Moran Auctioneers; Respondent: Verity Management Ltd; Respondent: Chief Magistrate's Court Milimani Commercial Law Courts; Applicant: Symon Thuo Gachahi Muhia
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E076 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Outcome
suit transferred to the Environment and Land Court for want of jurisdiction
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court, Landlord Tenant Disputes, Judicial Review Transfer
Source Language
en
Land and Property Jurisdiction of Environment and Land Court Landlord Tenant Disputes Judicial Review Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Jonah H Kariuki t/a Moran Auctioneers

Respondent

Verity Management Ltd

Respondent

Chief Magistrate's Court Milimani Commercial Law Courts

Respondent

Symon Thuo Gachahi Muhia

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to use and occupation of business premises arising from a rent dispute between landlord and tenant.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the ex parte Applicant’s Chamber Summons because the dispute concerned the use and occupation of business premises, a matter reserved for the Environment and Land Court under the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of the suit to the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi for further hearing and determination, ensuring that the matter would be handled by the court with the appropriate jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

suit transferred to the Environment and Land Court for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • This suit is hereby transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi for further hearing and determination.
  • The ex parte Applicants’ Chamber Summons dated 14th December 2020 shall be placed before the Duty Judge at the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi on 30th December 2020 for directions.