[2002] KEHC 321 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was subjected to repeated and unjustified prosecution by the police, amounting to an abuse of office. The trial magistrate's acquittal of the applicant under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code was appropriate, and the need for revision was rendered moot by the acquittal....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 321 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Joseph Ngigi Kamau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 19 of ??
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for revision dismissed as overtaken by events.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Office, Nolle Prosequi, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Unlawful Possession of Ammunition, Attempted Robbery With Violence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Joseph Ngigi Kamau
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was subjected to abuse of office by the police in the conduct of criminal proceedings.
- 2 Whether the request for revision was necessary in light of the acquittal under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 3 Whether the continued prosecution constituted an abuse of process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was subjected to repeated and unjustified prosecution by the police, amounting to an abuse of office. The trial magistrate's acquittal of the applicant under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code was appropriate, and the need for revision was rendered moot by the acquittal. The court held that the review was not necessary as the applicant had already been acquitted and the abuse had been addressed by the trial court's findings.
Court Disposition
Application for revision dismissed as overtaken by events.
Orders
- The request for revision is dismissed.
- No further orders are made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO. 19 OF 2000
REPUBLIC ….……………………………………………. PROSECUTOR - VERSUS - JOSEPH NGIGI KAMAU …………………………………….. ACCUSED
R U L I N G
The matter came before me by way of Revision and although the request for revision was done 16th August, 2000, the file was not brought to me until the 17th May, 2002.
The Applicant Joseph Ngugi Kamau was charged in Criminal Case No. 4288 of 1998 together with another with 3 counts. On count 1, they were charged with attempted Robbery with violence contrary to Section 297 of the Penal Code, on count II with unlawful possession of Firearm Contrary to Section 4(1) (a) of the Firearm Act and on Count III with unlawful possession of Ammunition contrary to Section 4(2) (a) of the Firearm Act.
The trial terminated after the state entered a nolie Prosequi. They were however re-arrested and charged in Criminal Case No.2931/99 which never took off and after a period of one year and some months the trial Court acquitted the applicant herein under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code. At the time, the Court commented that it would have done so sooner but for this Review which was pending.
I have looked at the records of both trials and I agree with the trial Magistrate L. Achode that this is a clear case of abuse of office by the police. They were bend on having the Applicant tried for dubious offences at any cost.
In view of the trial Court’s finding in Criminal Case No.2831/98, the need for Review is overtaken in any case, this to my mind was not a proper case for a review.
Dated at Mombasa this 28th day of May, 2002.
P.M. TUTUI COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE