[2007] KEHC 3166 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, charged as a director, committed the offence of stealing by director, as the evidence only established that he was a chairman, not a director. Furthermore, the grounds of appeal raised by the Attorney General were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 3166 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Republic; Respondent: Joseph Wanjohi Nderitu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 330 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stealing by Director, Burden of Proof, Appeal Against Acquittal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Appellant
Joseph Wanjohi Nderitu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence adduced supported the charge of stealing by director against the respondent.
- 2 Whether the Attorney General was entitled to appeal against the acquittal on matters of fact rather than law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, charged as a director, committed the offence of stealing by director, as the evidence only established that he was a chairman, not a director. Furthermore, the grounds of appeal raised by the Attorney General were matters of fact, not law, and thus the appeal was not properly before the court under Section 348A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, there was no justification to overturn the acquittal, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
Criminal Appeal 330 of 2002
REPUBLIC……………………………………………..……..……….APPELLANT
VERSUS
JOSEPH WANJOHI NDERITU……………………………..…….RESPONDENT
(Being Appeal against the sentence and conviction by M. R. Gitonga, Senior Resident Magistrate, in the Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 3862 of 2001 at Nyeri)
JUDGMENT
This is an appeal against the decision of M. R. Gitonga dated 7th August 2002, then Senior Resident Magistrate. It was delivered on 8th August 2002 acquitting the Respondent of the charge of stealing by director contrary to Section 282 of the Penal Code. Particulars alleged that on divers dates between 16th July and 2nd October 2001 at Nyeri Township within Central Province, the Respondent, being a director of North Tetu Company Limited stole Kshs.159,000/= from the said North Tetu Farmers Company Limited.
The Republic was aggrieved by the acquittal and therefore appealed and the appeal has been argued by State Counsel Mrs Ngalyuka. Mr. Gachiri Kariuki, Advocate, represented the Respondent.
From what has been brought to my attention during the hearing of the appeal, there are two things I should point out.
Firstly, the Respondent was charged in his capacity as “a director of North Tetu Farmers Company Limited yet the evidence adduced by the prosecution showed that the Respondent was a “Chairman” and not a “Director”. I am not therefore convinced that the evidence which was adduced against the Respondent as “a Chairman” was good evidence against him as “a Director.” In other words, did that evidence support the charge? That issue was ignored during the hearing of this appeal. But I bear it in my mind when looking at the evidence on record.
From my own evaluation of that evidence, it is my finding that the prosecution did not succeed in proving the case against the Respondent beyond reasonable doubt and therefore there was no justification for the conviction the Appellant is looking for in this appeal against the Respondent.
I should add that under Section 348 A of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Attorney General is allowed to appeal against an acquittal on a matter of law only. But strictly looking at the grounds of appeal in this appeal, they are matters of facts and hardly matters of law. It follows the Attorney General ought not to have filed this appeal.
It follows therefore that this appeal has no merits and the same is hereby dismissed.
Dated this 19th day of February 2007.
J. M. KHAMONI
JUDGE