[2014] KEHC 353 (KLR)
The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused was a flight risk due to an attempted escape, this assertion alone did not amount to a compelling reason sufficient to override the constitutional presumption in favor of bail. The court emphasized that the right to bond is constitutionally protected and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 353 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Josphat Musungu Amani alias Josphat Mukhonyi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 103 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Oral Bond Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bond granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Flight Risk, Murder Charge, Constitutional Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Josphat Musungu Amani alias Josphat Mukhonyi
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Oral Bond Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bond pending trial for a murder charge.
- 2 Whether the prosecution has demonstrated compelling reasons to deny bond, specifically flight risk.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused was a flight risk due to an attempted escape, this assertion alone did not amount to a compelling reason sufficient to override the constitutional presumption in favor of bail. The court emphasized that the right to bond is constitutionally protected and that the prosecution's evidence did not meet the threshold required to deny bond. Consequently, the accused was granted bond on reasonable conditions, balancing the accused's rights with the need to ensure attendance at trial.
Court Disposition
bond granted with conditions
Orders
- The accused is granted a personal bond of KES 1,000,000 with two sureties of similar amount.
- The accused must attend court every 30 days until the case is heard and determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 103 OF 2014
REPUBLIC……………………………………………………………PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
JOSPHAT MUSUNGU AMANI alias JOSEPHAT MUKHONYI…………ACCUSED
RULING
This an oral application by the accused’s counsel for bond for the accused. The application was made on 29th October, 2014. The applicant, Josephat Musungu Amani Alias Josphat Mukhonyi was charged for murder on 26th of September, 2014 contrary to section 203 as read with 204 of the Penal Code, that at Keroka Township in Masaba South District within Kisii County, jointly with others not before court murdered Charles Onchari Gisebe. He denies the offence. He now applies for bond as the constitution allows bond provided that there are no compelling reasons not to allow bond.
The state, in response hereto, has filed an affidavit dated 27th October, 2014. In paragraph 3 of the said affidavit, the state avers that the accused herein tried to escape after committing the offence only to be apprehended while in the process. Thus he is therefore considered a flight risk.
Further, in paragraph 6, thereof, the prosecution urge the court not to release the accused on bond/bail.
Article 49(1)(h) of the constitution, makes, after all, the offence of murder bailable. This must, however, be balanced against the rights of the victim and the victim’s family.
The state by, citing flight-risk, is of the view that this one of the compelling reason why the accused should be denied bail.
The counsel for the accused states that the reason given by the state is not sufficient cause to deny bail/bond to the accused. I am inclined to think the same that this assertion of flight-risk is not sufficient cause, it may be a cause but not an adequate, not sufficient cause against the overwhelming permissibility that the constitution affords the accused person in respect of bail and upon reasonable conditions.
Accordingly, I allow the accused a personal bond of kshs. 1,000,000 with two sureties of similar amount. Thus upon being released on bond, the accused will be required to attend court every 30 days until his case is heard and determined. Any default, the bond shall be cancelled forthwith and the two sureties will be made to account.
The next mention date will be 4th of December, 2014.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at KISII this 7th day of November, 2014.
C.B. NAGILLAH,
JUDGE.
In the presence of:-
Omwega holding brief for Okenye for the applicant.
No appearance for the respondent.
Edwin Mongare Court Clerk.