[2018] KEHC 7357 (KLR)
The court found that the pre-bail report indicated the accused was associated with criminal activities of similar magnitude to the present charge, was poorly integrated into the community, and was considered a threat to peace. His own family was unwilling to bail him out, citing his long absence from home and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 7357 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Jotham Mawira
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 83 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- bail denied; accused to remain in custody pending trial
- Judges
- F Gikonyo
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Compelling Reasons, Flight Risk, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Jotham Mawira
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused person bail pending trial.
- 2 Whether the accused poses a flight risk or threat to public peace justifying denial of bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the pre-bail report indicated the accused was associated with criminal activities of similar magnitude to the present charge, was poorly integrated into the community, and was considered a threat to peace. His own family was unwilling to bail him out, citing his long absence from home and the risk of flight. Although there was no direct evidence of the alleged criminal activities, the court found no reason to doubt the pre-bail report's contents. The court concluded that there was a real possibility of the accused absconding, and therefore his attendance in court could not be guaranteed. This constituted a compelling reason under the law to deny bail. The application...
Court Disposition
bail denied; accused to remain in custody pending trial
Orders
- The accused person's application for bail is rejected.
- The accused shall remain remanded in custody pending the hearing and determination of the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 83 OF 2017
REPUBLIC………………………………………………….PROSECUTOR
Versus
JOTHAM MAWIRA……………………………………………...ACCUSED
RULING
[1] The accused person is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code CAP 63 of the Laws of Kenya. The accused person has now applied to be released on bond, pending the hearing and determination of this case. Of course it is his right to be released on bond on reasonable conditions unless there are compelling reasons not to release him See Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution.
[2] I am not aware of any scientific measure of what exactly amounts to compelling reasons as that would depend on the circumstances of each case. Except, however, compelling reason should be a reason or reasons which is rousing, strong, interests attention, and brings conviction upon the court that the accused person should be denied bail. Flimsy reasons will not therefore do. The standard is quite high and draws from the constitutional philosophy that any restriction of rights and freedoms of persons must be sufficiently justified given the robust Bill of Rights enshrined in the Constitution. On this, see the case of R vs. JOKTAN MAYENDE & 3 OTHERS [2013] eKLR.
[3] The pre-bail report recorded that the accused person has been associated with criminal activities of the same magnitude. The sub chief stated that the accused integrated badly with other people in the community and was a threat to peace. His own family members were not ready to bail him out saying he had disappeared from home a long time ago and was therefore a flight risk. Although there was no evidence of the criminal activities the accused engaged into, there is nothing negates the contents of the pre-bail report. There is real possibility of the accused absconding. Therefore, his attendance in court is not guaranteed. Such is a compelling reason for which bail may be denied. Applying the test of the law, I am convinced that there are compelling reasons not to release the accused on bond. Accordingly the accused person’s application for bail is hereby rejected. Accused person shall remain remanded in custody pending the hearing and determination of this case.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 20th day of March 2018
-----------------
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Namiti for State
Non appearance for accused
------------------
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE