[2016] KEHC 271 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, as presented, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against all accused persons. Consequently, the court ruled that each accused should be put on his defence in accordance with the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code. The decision was based on the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 271 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Kazungu Fondo alias Onyango; Defendant: Habel Kahindi; Defendant: Kirimo Fondo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 6 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Each accused is put on his defence.
- Judges
- SJ Chitembwe
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Defence Stage, Criminal Trial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Kazungu Fondo alias Onyango
Defendant
Habel Kahindi
Defendant
Kirimo Fondo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being put on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, as presented, was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against all accused persons. Consequently, the court ruled that each accused should be put on his defence in accordance with the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code. The decision was based on the assessment that the evidence, if uncontradicted, would warrant a conviction, thus necessitating the accused to respond to the case against them.
Court Disposition
Each accused is put on his defence.
Orders
- Each accused is hereby put on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MALINDI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 6 OF 2015
REPUBLIC
VERSUS
KAZUNGU FONDO alias ONYANGO ……….…………1ST ACCUSED
HABEL KAHINDI ………………………………………..2ND ACCUSED
KIRIMO FONDO……………………………………..…..3RD ACCUSED
RULING
From the evidence on record, I do find that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against both accused persons. Each accused is hereby put on his defence.
Dated and delivered in Malindi this 8th day of November, 2016.
S.J. CHITEMBWE
JUDGE