[2025] KEHC 1380 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, through the evidence of nine witnesses and the exhibits produced, established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. At this stage, the court is not required to determine guilt beyond reasonable doubt but only whether there is sufficient evidence to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 1380 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Abdi Hassan Keinan
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E003 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution's Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
- Judges
- JN Onyiego
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Elements of Murder, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Abdi Hassan Keinan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
- 2 What constitutes a prima facie case in a charge of murder under Kenyan law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, through the evidence of nine witnesses and the exhibits produced, established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. At this stage, the court is not required to determine guilt beyond reasonable doubt but only whether there is sufficient evidence to require the accused to answer the charge. The court applied the principles from relevant case law and statutory provisions, concluding that the prosecution's evidence met the threshold to put the accused on his defence. Accordingly, the accused is required to elect whether to give sworn or unsworn testimony or to remain silent, and may call witnesses in his defence.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
- The accused may elect to give sworn or unsworn testimony or remain silent, and may call witnesses in his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Republic v Keinan (Criminal Case E003 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 1380 (KLR) (19 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 1380 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Garissa
Criminal Case E003 of 2024
JN Onyiego, J
February 19, 2025
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Abdi Hassan Keinan
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused person is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on 12. 05. 2024, at Eltutu area, Hirimani Ward, Tana North Sub – County within Tana River County, he murdered one Mohammud Mohamed Adhan.
2. Having pleaded not guilty to the charges, prosecution called a total of nine (9) witnesses in its endeavor to prove its case. At the close of the prosecutions’ case, both counsel did not submit on whether the accused has a case to answer or not.
3. At this stage of the proceedings, the court is expected to make a finding as to whether a prima facie case has been established to warrant accused being put on his defence or not. In Republic vs Abdi Ibrahim Owl [2013] Eklr, a prima facie case was defined as follows:-“Prima facie” is a Latin word defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition as “Sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless disproved or rebutted”. “Prima facie case” is defined by the same dictionary as “The establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption”.
4. To sustain a conviction on a charge of murder, the prosecution is under both legal and evidential obligation to prove certain ingredients of the offence. The case of Anthony Ndegwa Ngari vs Republic (2014) eKLR, listed the elements of the offence of murder as follows: -(a) the death of the deceased occurred; (b) that the accused committed the unlawful act which caused the death of the deceased; and (c) that the accused had malice aforethought.
5. At this stage, the court is not concerned with the test of proof beyond reasonable doubt, but whether there exists some prima facie evidence capable of calling the accused to state his defence.
6. The Criminal Procedure Code under Section 306 provides as follows:“(1)When the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution has been concluded, the court, if it considers that there is no evidence that the accused or any one of several accused committed the offence shall, after hearing, if necessary, any arguments which the advocate for the prosecution or the defence may desire to submit, record a finding of not guilty.(2)When the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution has been concluded, the court, if it considers that there is evidence that the accused person or any one or more of several accused persons committed the offence, shall inform each such accused person of his right to address the court, either personally or by his advocate(if any), to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence, and in all cases shall require him or his advocate (if any) to state whether he intends to call any witness as to fact other than the accused person himself; and upon being informed thereof, the judge shall record the fact.”
7. Equally, in the case of Republic vs Robert Zippora Nzilu (2020) eKLR, Odunga J. held that:“That there is a danger in making definitive findings at this stage, especially where the Court finds that there is a case to answer is not farfetched and the reasons for not doing so are obvious”.
8. I have considered the evidence adduced by the nine prosecution witnesses against the accused person and the exhibits produced thereof. From the foregoing, I am persuaded that a prima facie case has been established against the accused person.
9. In view of the above holding, it is my finding that the prosecution has established a primafacie case to warrant accused being put on his defence. To that extent, accused herein has a case to answer. He will therefore make either sworn testimony in which case he will be subjected to cross examination or unsworn testimony in which he will not be cross examined. He will as well opt to keep quiet. In either case he shall be free to call witnesses.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025. J. N. ONYIEGOJUDGE