[2013] KEHC 2034 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had called 15 witnesses, including two eyewitnesses and an administrator who acted on a report, and that their evidence was clear and sufficient to establish a prima facie case against all four accused persons. Consequently, the court held that the accused persons should be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 2034 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Kennedy Ireri alias Chuma; Defendant: Stanley Gitonga Kivuti; Defendant: John Kariuki Njiru; Defendant: Obadiah Mugendi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 12 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Murder Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution's Case
- Outcome
- All accused persons placed on their defence.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Kennedy Ireri alias Chuma
Defendant
Stanley Gitonga Kivuti
Defendant
John Kariuki Njiru
Defendant
Obadiah Mugendi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Murder Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being placed on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had called 15 witnesses, including two eyewitnesses and an administrator who acted on a report, and that their evidence was clear and sufficient to establish a prima facie case against all four accused persons. Consequently, the court held that the accused persons should be placed on their defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling was based on the legal standard that, at the close of the prosecution's case, the court must determine whether there is sufficient evidence on which a reasonable tribunal could convict if no explanation is offered by the accused. The court was satisfied that this threshold had been met.
Court Disposition
All accused persons placed on their defence.
Orders
- All four accused persons are hereby placed on their defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
MURDER CASE NO. 12 OF 2010
REPUBLIC..................................................PROSECUTION
VERSUS
KENNEDY IRERI ALIAS CHUMA...........….........1ST ACCUSED
STANLEY GITONGA KIVUTI...........................2ND ACCUSED
JOHN KARIUKI NJIRU..................................3RD ACCUSED
OBADIAH MUGENDI.....................................4TH ACCUSED
R U L I N G
The four accused persons were all charged with the offence of Murder contrary to section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The prosecution called a total of 15 witnesses whose evidence is very clear. PW7 and PW10 were at the scene and have stated what they witnessed. PW8 received a report as an administrator and acted.
I have considered the submissions by all counsels. I am however satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against all the four accused persons who I hereby place on their defence under the provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Penal Code.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013.
H.I. ONG’UDI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ms. Ingahizu for State
Mr. Ken Githinji for Mugambi for 1st Accused
Mr. Ken Githinji for 2nd Accused
Mr. Ken Githinji for Ms. Njeru for 3rd Accused
Mr. Ken Githinji for Momanyi for 4th Accused
Njue CC