[2020] KEHC 5901 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 5901 (KLR)

The Court determined that, in light of the Applicant's challenge to the procurement process and the prior proceedings before the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board, the question of leave to commence judicial review proceedings raises issues that require inter partes hearing. The Court also considered the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 5901 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Kenya Pipeline Company Limited; Applicant: Lady Lori (Kenya) Limited; Interested Party: M/S Helint Aviation Limited; Interested Party: M/S Level Up Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application 99 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Directions for Inter Partes Hearing
Outcome
Directions issued for inter partes hearing of the application for leave to apply for judicial review; no final determination on the merits at this stage.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Public Procurement, Judicial Review Leave, Tender Award Challenge, Court Jurisdiction, Electronic Filing, Covid19 Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Commercial and Corporate Public Procurement Judicial Review Leave Tender Award Challenge Court Jurisdiction Electronic Filing Covid19 Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Kenya Pipeline Company Limited

Respondent

Lady Lori (Kenya) Limited

Applicant

M/S Helint Aviation Limited

Interested Party

M/S Level Up Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Directions for Inter Partes Hearing

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to commence judicial review proceedings against the Respondent regarding the tender award.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application in light of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act and prior proceedings before the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board.
  3. 3 What directions should be given for the hearing of the application in the context of COVID-19 restrictions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, in light of the Applicant's challenge to the procurement process and the prior proceedings before the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board, the question of leave to commence judicial review proceedings raises issues that require inter partes hearing. The Court also considered the statutory framework under the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, which governs the High Court's jurisdiction in procurement disputes. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the scaling down of court operations, the Court issued detailed directions for electronic service, filing, and hearing of the application to ensure procedural fairness and compliance with public health...

Court Disposition

Directions issued for inter partes hearing of the application for leave to apply for judicial review; no final determination on the merits at this stage.

Orders

  • The Applicant shall serve the Respondent and Interested Parties with the Chamber Summons, supporting documents, skeletal submissions, a copy of the directions, and a hearing notice within thirty days.
  • The Respondent and Interested Parties are granted leave to file and serve their responses within thirty days of service by the Applicant.