[2021] KEHC 7274 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7274 (KLR)

The court held that the applicant's application for stay was premature and incompetent because leave to commence judicial review proceedings had not yet been granted. Without leave, there was no substantive suit before the court upon which a stay order could be anchored. Furthermore, the court noted that the issue...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7274 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Nicholas Muyale; Respondent: Kenya Veterinary Board (KVB)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E047 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies, Stay of Decision
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies Stay of Decision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Nicholas Muyale

Applicant

Kenya Veterinary Board (KVB)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Stay

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of stay before leave to commence judicial review proceedings is granted.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has exhausted the statutory remedies under section 37 of the Veterinary Surgeons and Veterinary Para-Professionals Act before approaching the court.
  3. 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant stay orders in the absence of a substantive suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant's application for stay was premature and incompetent because leave to commence judicial review proceedings had not yet been granted. Without leave, there was no substantive suit before the court upon which a stay order could be anchored. Furthermore, the court noted that the issue of exhaustion of statutory remedies under section 37 of the Veterinary Surgeons and Veterinary Para-Professionals Act was still pending determination, and this issue directly affected the court's jurisdiction to entertain the matter. As such, the court found that there was no legal basis or substratum for granting the stay orders sought by the applicant at this stage.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 15th April 2021 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
  • The Applicant shall comply with the directions given herein on 13th April 2021 and this matter shall proceed for hearing on 25th May 2021.