[2020] KEHC 5237 (KLR)
The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant had spent in remand custody as required by Section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court revised the sentence to three years imprisonment effective from the date the applicant first appeared in court, 6th March 2017. In...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 5237 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Kevin Anzenze
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 196 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed; sentence revised; applicant released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- J Wakiaga
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Remand Periods, Criminal Revision, Covid19 Release
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Kevin Anzenze
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred by failing to consider the period the applicant spent in remand under Section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a revision of sentence in light of time already served and the Covid-19 pandemic.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant had spent in remand custody as required by Section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court revised the sentence to three years imprisonment effective from the date the applicant first appeared in court, 6th March 2017. In view of the Covid-19 pandemic and the period already served, the court ordered the applicant's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held, substituting the original sentence with the period already served.
Court Disposition
application allowed; sentence revised; applicant released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The application is allowed.
- The trial court's judgment is revised to three years imprisonment with effect from 6/3/2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 196 OF 2019
REPUBLIC ………………………………………………………RESPONDENT
VERSUS
KEVIN ANZENZE….………..…......…………........………….….…. ACCUSED
RULING
In view of the fact that the trial court did not consider the period the applicant had been in remand under the provisions of Section 333 of CPC, I hereby allow the application herein and revise the trial court’s judgments to three years with effect from 6/3/2017 when the Applicant first appeared in court but in view of Covid-19 pandemic, the Applicant to be released forthwith from prison unless otherwise lawfully held, the court having substituted the said judgment with the period already served.
SIGNED DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 11th DAY OF June 2020 through Google Teams.
..........................
J. WAKIAGA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mr. Momanyi for the Applicant
Applicant in person
Court Assistant: Karwitha