[2021] KEHC 8032 (KLR)
The court found that both the pre-bail report and the victim impact statement were favourable to the accused. There were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to justify denial of bail. The court emphasized the constitutional right to bail under Article 49(1)(h) and the principle that bail's primary...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 8032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Benard Bii Kibet
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bomet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 13 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- bail_granted_with_conditions
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report, Victim Impact Statement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Benard Bii Kibet
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial under Article 49 (1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both the pre-bail report and the victim impact statement were favourable to the accused. There were no compelling reasons presented by the prosecution to justify denial of bail. The court emphasized the constitutional right to bail under Article 49(1)(h) and the principle that bail's primary purpose is to secure the accused's attendance at trial. The court concluded that the accused should be released on bail with specified conditions to ensure attendance and non-interference with the trial.
Court Disposition
bail_granted_with_conditions
Orders
- The accused shall post cash bail of Kshs.500,000 with one surety of similar amount.
- Alternatively, the accused shall execute a personal bond of Kshs.500,000 with two sureties of Kshs.500,000 each.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BOMET
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 13 OF 2020
REPUBLIC................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
BENARD BII KIBET.........................................................ACCUSED
RULING ON BAIL
1. This ruling is in respect of the Accused’s application for bail pending trial. The Accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code (CAP 63) laws of Kenya. The particulars of the offence are that on 9th day of June 2020 at about 0900 hours at Soget village, Kimugul location within Bomet East Sub-county murdered Geoffrey Kipkemoi Bii.
2. The Accused took plea on 29th June, 2020 and denied the charge. His trial is set to start on 22nd July, 2021. He now seeks to be released on bail.
3. In urging the application, defence counsel Ms. Chepkemoi submitted that the Accused was not a flight risk and prayed that he be released on favourable bond terms. Counsel further submitted that the pre-bail report was favourable to the Accused.
4. On his part Mr. Mureithi Principal Prosecution Counsel submitted that the prosecution had no compelling reasons and that the pre-bail report seemed positive. He however drew the attention of the court to one of the conclusions in the report which stated that the Accused’s father had confided that the Accused respected him but had little regard for his mother whom he constantly abused and threatened.
5. I have considered the application. I have also considered the pre-bail report and the victim impact statement. Both reports are favourable to the accused. It is the duty of the court to consider the application on the basis of Article 49 (i) h which grants a suspect or an Accused the right to bail. In considering the application, the court also bears in mind that the primary purpose of bail is to ensure that the accused attends his trial.
6. I have come to the conclusion that there are no compelling reasons to deny the accused bail. He is released on the following conditions:-
i) He shall post cash bail of Kshs.500,000/= with one surety of similar amount.
ii) In the alternative to (i) above, he shall execute a personal bond of Kshs.500,000 with 2 sureties of 500,000 each.
iii) He shall attend court whenever required and shall not impede the trial in any way.
7. Orders accordingly.
Ruling delivered, dated and signed this 24th day of February, 2021.
...................................
R. LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE
Ruling delivered in the presence of the Accused, Defence Counsel Ms. Chepkemoi, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP, and Kiprotich (Court Assistant).