[2023] KEHC 18426 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 18426 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused persons based on the evidence adduced by its witnesses. The testimonies provided a sufficient circumstantial chain linking the accused to the offence of murder, and there was nothing in the prosecution's case inconsistent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 18426 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Josphat Kichirchir; Defendant: Gideon Kiprono; Defendant: Lameck Kipkorir
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E072 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution's Case
Outcome
Accused persons found to have a case to answer and ordered to state their defence.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Standard of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case Case to Answer Criminal Procedure Standard of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Josphat Kichirchir

Defendant

Gideon Kiprono

Defendant

Lameck Kipkorir

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution's Case

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons sufficient to require them to be put on their defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence adduced by the prosecution, if uncontroverted, would warrant a conviction for the offence of murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused persons based on the evidence adduced by its witnesses. The testimonies provided a sufficient circumstantial chain linking the accused to the offence of murder, and there was nothing in the prosecution's case inconsistent with the elements of the offence as prescribed in section 203 of the Penal Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the accused persons had a case to answer and should be called upon to state their defence under sections 306(2) and 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Accused persons found to have a case to answer and ordered to state their defence.

Orders

  • The accused persons are found to have a case to answer.
  • The accused are called upon to state their defence under Section 306(2) and 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code on July 17, 2023.