[2023] KEHC 18944 (KLR)
The court found that the accused is constitutionally entitled to bail unless compelling reasons are shown to deny it. The prosecution did not advance any compelling reasons to oppose bail. The pre-bail report was favorable, indicating community and family support for the accused and no prior record of absconding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 18944 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Mary Mukami Kinyanjui
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E001 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail application allowed. Accused to be released on bond.
- Judges
- PM Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Murder Charge, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report, Constitutional Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Mary Mukami Kinyanjui
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for murder charges.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused is constitutionally entitled to bail unless compelling reasons are shown to deny it. The prosecution did not advance any compelling reasons to oppose bail. The pre-bail report was favorable, indicating community and family support for the accused and no prior record of absconding bail. The seriousness of the offence alone does not constitute a compelling reason to deny bail. In the absence of any compelling reasons, the presumption in favor of granting bail prevails. Therefore, the application for bail was merited and granted on reasonable terms.
Court Disposition
Bail application allowed. Accused to be released on bond.
Orders
- The accused is to be released on a bond of Kshs 500,000 plus one surety of a similar amount.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Republic v Kinyanjui (Criminal Case E001 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 18944 (KLR) (22 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 18944 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Criminal Case E001 of 2023
PM Mulwa, J
June 22, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Mary Mukami Kinyanjui
Accused
Ruling
1. The court has been called upon to determine the bond/bail application of the accused herei Mary Mukami Kinyanjui, pending trial. The accused was charged with two counts of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars are that on December 31, 2022 between 2030hrs and 2200hrs in Thamanda area in Kikuyu Sub-County within Kiambu County, she murdered Brian Kinyanjui Gaitho and Elizabeth Wambui Gaitho.
2. The accused took a on January 26, 2023, and pleaded not guilty to the two counts.
3. Mr Mwangi advocate for the accused urged the court to release the accused on reasonable bail terms pending trial.
4. Mr Gacharia the state counsel informed the court that the victims were the accused children and the incident elicited mixed reactions in the community. He urged the court to call for a pre-bail report to guide its decision.
5. A pre-bail report was filed on April 25, 2023 and it shows that the local administration and the community at Gitaru were not opposed to her release on bond. The accused family is supportive and is willing to assist her. The accused promises to abide by the terms of release to be set by the court.
6. An accused person has a constitutional duty for the release on bond/bail pending trial. Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution provides that: “an arrested person has the right to be released on bond or bail on reasonable conditions pending a charge or trial unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.”
7. Further, section 123A of the Criminal Procedure Code gives the parameters for the grant of the right to bail as follows:"(1)Subject to Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution and notwithstanding section 123, in deciding on bail and bond, the Court shall have regard to all the relevant circumstances and in particular—(a)the nature or seriousness of the offence;(b)the character, antecedents, associations and community ties of the accused person;(c)the defendant's record in respect of the fulfilment of obligations under previous grants of bail; and;(d)the strength of the evidence of his having committed the offence;(2)A person who is arrested or charged with any offence shall be granted bail unless the court is satisfied that the person—a.has previously been granted bail and has failed to surrender to custody and if released on bail (whether or not subject to conditions) he would likely fail to surrender to custody;b.should be kept in custody for his protection"
8. The state counsel is not opposed to the release of the accused person on bond/bail. The accused has not been admitted to previous bail terms. The community avers the accused is a good person in society. The state has not raised any compelling reasons that would deny the accused bail/bond.
9. In the absence of any compelling reasons by the state counsel, the presumption in granting bail prevails. The pre-bail report also favours the release of the accused on reasonable bail/bond.
10. Accordingly, this court finds the bail application is merited.
11. The accused is to be released on a bond of Kshs, 500,000/= plus one surety of a similar amount.
RULING DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBUTHIS22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2023. …………………………..………………P.M. MULWAJUDGEIn the Presence of:Kinyua – court assistantAccused - PresentMr. Muriuki - for the stateN/A by advocate for accused