[2022] KEHC 11198 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence on record was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused person. Consequently, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was put on his defence in accordance with section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court explained the three...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 11198 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Simon Mwanzia Kinyili
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 02 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Section 211 Cpc
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Simon Mwanzia Kinyili
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant putting him on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence on record was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused person. Consequently, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was put on his defence in accordance with section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court explained the three options available to the accused in his defence as required by law.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is put on his defence.
- The accused is to be explained the three options available to him under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
Republic v Kinyili (Criminal Case 02 of 2019) [2022] KEHC 11198 (KLR) (15 June 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 11198 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Makueni
Criminal Case 02 of 2019
GMA Dulu, J
June 15, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Simon Mwanzia Kinyili
Accused
Ruling
1. Having considered the prosecution evidence on record, I am of the view that the prosecution has established aprima facie case against the accused person.
2. I thus find that the accused person has a case to answer, put him on his defence, and proceed to explain to him the three options available to him in his defence under section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code (cap.75).
**Delivered, Signed & dated this 15th day of June 2022, in open court at Makueni.George DuluJudge