[2022] KEHC 3385 (KLR)
The court directed that the revision application be served upon the defence counsel to ensure the respondent is accorded a fair opportunity to be heard. The defence counsel was granted liberty to file a replying affidavit, upholding the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. These directions are...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 3385 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Henry Kipngeno
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E049 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Interpartes Hearing Scheduled; Directions on Service and Response
- Outcome
- Directions issued for service and response; matter set for interpartes hearing.
- Judges
- AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Revision Procedure, Service of Process, Replying Affidavit, Interpartes Hearing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Henry Kipngeno
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Interpartes Hearing Scheduled; Directions on Service and Response
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the revision application should be served upon the defence counsel for interpartes hearing.
- 2 Whether the defence counsel should be granted liberty to file a replying affidavit to the revision application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court directed that the revision application be served upon the defence counsel to ensure the respondent is accorded a fair opportunity to be heard. The defence counsel was granted liberty to file a replying affidavit, upholding the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. These directions are necessary to facilitate an interpartes hearing, allowing both parties to present their positions before the court determines the merits of the revision application.
Court Disposition
Directions issued for service and response; matter set for interpartes hearing.
Orders
- The revision application to be served upon the defence counsel for interpartes hearing on 6/5/2022.
- The defence counsel is at liberty to file a replying affidavit to the revision application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
Republic v Kipngeno (Criminal Revision E049 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 3385 (KLR) (6 May 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 3385 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kericho
Criminal Revision E049 of 2022
AN Ongeri, J
May 6, 2022
Between
Republic
Applicant
and
Henry Kipngeno
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Accused Person was represented at the Trial by J. K. Mutai Advocate.
2. The Revision Application to be served upon the Defence Counsel for Interpartes hearing on 6/5/2022.
3. The Defence Counsel is at Liberty to file a Replying Affidavit to the Revision Application.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KERICHO THIS 6THDAY OF MAY, 2022. A. N. ONGERIJUDGECRIMINAL REVISION NO.E049 OF 2022 Page 1