[2025] KEHC 1562 (KLR)
The court found that, although murder is a grave offence, the circumstances of the case—including the lack of prior convictions, the remorse shown by the accused, the forgiveness by the victim's family, and the hardship faced by the children—warranted a lenient sentence. The court also considered the accused's time...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 1562 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Lemmy Makari Kituyi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E005 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, Domestic Violence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Lemmy Makari Kituyi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to the mandatory penalty for murder or a lesser sentence based on mitigation and circumstances.
- 2 Whether the period spent in remand should be considered in computing the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, although murder is a grave offence, the circumstances of the case—including the lack of prior convictions, the remorse shown by the accused, the forgiveness by the victim's family, and the hardship faced by the children—warranted a lenient sentence. The court also considered the accused's time in remand and the recommendations of the pre-sentence report. The essential legal principle applied was that sentencing for murder is not always mandatory life imprisonment; judicial discretion may be exercised where mitigation is compelling and the interests of justice require mercy. The court thus sentenced the accused to fifteen years' imprisonment, with the period already...
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The accused, Lemmy Makari Kituyi, is sentenced to fifteen (15) years' imprisonment.
- The period spent in remand custody since February 2022 shall be taken into account in computing the sentence as provided under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Republic v Kituyi (Criminal Case E005 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 1562 (KLR) (27 February 2025) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 1562 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bungoma
Criminal Case E005 of 2022
REA Ougo, J
February 27, 2025
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Lemmy Makari Kituyi
Accused
Sentence
1. Lemmy Makari Kituyu was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The deceased was his wife. Upon conviction and a after a full hearing, the court sought a pre-sentence report to help in determining an appropriate sentence.
2. The accused is a first offender.
3. The pre-sentence report states the following: he is 52 years old and has no previous convictions. The accused has a humble background. The victim's family has forgiven him, and they have left it to the court to exercise its discretion on the matter. The community was angered by the incident of the loss of life and they are alive to the fact that the incident was a normal domestic fight and that the accused had no intention of taking away the life of the deceased. The accused has 7 children with the deceased some of them are now being taken care of by relatives in different locations. Both families are open to reconciliation. The report further indicates that the families are on talking terms and that the court may exercise mercy by giving him a lenient sentence, the couple having enjoyed a harmonious relationship with the deceased for over 20 years.
4. The accused’s counsel stated as follows in mitigation: The accused prays for leniency. He regrets the events of 19th and 20th February 2022. The accused and deceased were under the influence of alcohol. The deceased left seven children who have since been scattered and are being taken care of by relatives. Before this, they had lived together for the last 23 years, and currently, the burden of taking care of their children is on the extended family members, which has come at a great cost. The accused has been in custody since February 2022, he seeks the said period to be considered whilst sentencing him.
5. Murder is a serious offence. I have considered the pre-sentence report and mitigation. I have also considered the evidence adduced on how the deceased died. The accused was found beating his wife, and despite the neighbour’s intervention, he continued to beat his wife. He blames alcohol, but choices have consequences. I have also considered the guidelines on sentencing. The report recommends a lenient sentence. I, therefore, sentence Lemmy Makari Kituyi to serve fifteen (15) imprisonment. The period he has spent in remand shall be taken into account whilst computing his sentence as provided under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
DATED , SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT BUNGOMA ON THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025. R.OUGOJUDGEIn the presence of:Lemmy Makari Kituyi/ AccusedMr. Maloba -For the accusedMiss Matere - For the StateWilkister - C/A