[2017] KEELC 1978 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1978 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as the registered proprietor of the suit property, had made a lawful request for certified copies of the register and official search, which the 1st respondent refused to provide without justification. The respondents did not oppose the application. The court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1978 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Kwale Lands Registrar; Respondent: National Lands Commission; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Mandamus Orders, Access to Information, Land Registration, Administrative Duties
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Land and Property Mandamus Orders Access to Information Land Registration Administrative Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Kwale Lands Registrar

Respondent

National Lands Commission

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of mandamus compelling the 1st respondent to furnish certified copies of the register and official search for parcel Mombasa/Pangu Fuel Area/11.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st respondent has unlawfully refused to provide the requested documents to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as the registered proprietor of the suit property, had made a lawful request for certified copies of the register and official search, which the 1st respondent refused to provide without justification. The respondents did not oppose the application. The court held that the applicant had established a clear legal right to the documents and that the 1st respondent had a statutory duty to provide them. The refusal amounted to a breach of the applicant's rights under the Constitution and relevant statutes. Consequently, the court granted an order of mandamus compelling the 1st respondent to furnish the requested documents within twenty-one days.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order of mandamus is issued compelling the 1st respondent to furnish the applicant with certified copies of the register and official search in respect of land parcel number Mombasa/Pangu Fuel Area/11 within twenty-one (21) days from the date hereof.
  • No order as to costs.