[2016] KEHC 6081 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6081 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence showed that the accused was involved in a physical altercation with the deceased, during which the deceased sustained fatal injuries. The medical report confirmed the cause of death...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6081 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Kyalo Mulwa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitui
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 15 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution's Case
Outcome
Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to defend himself.
Judges
LN Mutende
Legal Topics
Murder, Case to Answer, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Case to Answer Burden of Proof Criminal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Kyalo Mulwa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer at Close of Prosecution's Case

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being put on his defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence adduced links the accused to the death of the deceased.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence showed that the accused was involved in a physical altercation with the deceased, during which the deceased sustained fatal injuries. The medical report confirmed the cause of death as brain death secondary to massive subdural haematoma due to skull fracture. The accused was identified as the person who struck the deceased with a piece of wood. Consequently, the court ruled that the accused should be put on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to defend himself.

Orders

  • The accused is called upon to defend himself pursuant to Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.