[2017] KEHC 174 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 174 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution, having called ten witnesses, had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons. This means that the evidence, if uncontroverted, would be sufficient to warrant a conviction. Therefore, the accused persons are required to give their...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 174 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Lampat Letongoros; Defendant: George Letongoros; Defendant: Benson Lepere
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 40 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Outcome
accused persons found to have a case to answer; ordered to give their defence
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case Criminal Procedure Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Lampat Letongoros

Defendant

George Letongoros

Defendant

Benson Lepere

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being put on their defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution, having called ten witnesses, had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons. This means that the evidence, if uncontroverted, would be sufficient to warrant a conviction. Therefore, the accused persons are required to give their defence in accordance with section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court did not make any findings on the credibility of the witnesses or the weight of the evidence at this stage, as the purpose of this ruling is solely to determine whether the accused have a case to answer.

Court Disposition

accused persons found to have a case to answer; ordered to give their defence

Orders

  • Each accused shall give his defence to the charge of murder.
  • Defence hearing scheduled for 8/12/2017.