[2024] KEHC 45 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for judicial review orders of mandamus relating to enforcement of a decree issued by the Chief Magistrate's Court exercising Environment and Land Court jurisdiction. The Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act confer exclusive jurisdiction...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 45 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Land Control Board Hamisi (Tiriki West Board); Applicant: Erick Enock Ratori
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Case Judicial Review Application E001 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Enforcement of Decrees, Jurisdiction of Courts, Environment and Land Court, Transfer of Land Title
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Land Control Board Hamisi (Tiriki West Board)
Respondent
Erick Enock Ratori
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for judicial review orders of mandamus relating to enforcement of a decree issued by the Chief Magistrate's Court exercising ELC jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the application for leave for judicial review orders of mandamus against the Land Control Board Hamisi (Tiriki West Board) is properly before the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for judicial review orders of mandamus relating to enforcement of a decree issued by the Chief Magistrate's Court exercising Environment and Land Court jurisdiction. The Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act confer exclusive jurisdiction over such matters to the Environment and Land Court. Article 165(5)(b) expressly bars the High Court from hearing disputes within the exclusive jurisdiction of the ELC. As the application seeks to enforce a land-related decree and is a continuation of proceedings from the ELC Chief Magistrate's Court, it falls squarely within the ELC's mandate. The application is therefore struck...
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The application dated 20th December 2023 is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- The applicant's counsel to be notified via email.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
Republic v Land Control Board Hamisi (Tiriki West Board); Ratori (Exparte Applicant) (Environment and Land Case Judicial Review Application E001 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 45 (KLR) (15 January 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 45 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Environment and Land Case Judicial Review Application E001 of 2023
RE Aburili, J
January 15, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDER FOR MANDAMUS AND IN THE MATTER OF ENFORCEMENT OF COURT ORDERS AND DECREE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND IN THE MATTER OF THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT ACT
Between
Republic
Applicant
and
Land Control Board Hamisi (Tiriki West Board)
Respondent
and
Erick Enock Ratori
Exparte Applicant
Ruling
1. This matter came up for directions under certificate of urgency on 22nd December 2023 before J. Kamau Judge of Vihiga, being the Recess Duty Judge. The learned Judge gave directions which were served on the applicant’s counsel on 5th January 2024 at 4. 07pm.
2. The application as filed and dated 20th December 2023 was to be served and heard today interpartes. It is now 10. 05am. The court started session at 9. 00am and called out this matter but there is no appearance by any of the parties.
3. I would have dismissed the application dated 20th December 2023 for non-attendance to prosecute. However, the application has caught my attention on the issue of jurisdiction.
4. It is now settled law that jurisdiction is everything without which a court of law acts in vain.
5. The application for leave to apply for Judicial Review orders of Mandamus against the Tiriki West Land Control Board is in respect of Land Parcel No Nyangori/Gamalenga/666 to enable the said title to be transferred to the Ex parte Applicant as the bonafide purchaser thereof.
6. In the grounds and supporting affidavit, the Ex parte Applicant claims that there is a judgment in ELC Cause No E153 of 2022 delivered on 12th September 2023 and that todate, there has been no transfer of the said title of land to the Ex parte Applicant herein hence this application.
7. It is alleged that the Respondent has refused to sign documents to facilitate the transfer of the subject parcel of land to the Ex parte Applicant. The ELC matter is before Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s Court and copy of decree in that case has been annexed to the sworn affidavit.
8. Having considered all the averments and depositions in the application, the question is whether this court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the application which is a purely land matter and more so, enforcement process of a decree issued by the Chief Magistrate’s court exercising jurisdiction as an Environment and Land Court.
9. Article 162(2) (b) of the Constitution establishes the Environment and Land Court with jurisdiction conferred on the court under the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act and other Land Acts, to hear and determine disputes relating to the environment and the use and occupation of, and, title to land.
10. In addition, Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court gives jurisdiction to the Court and among the orders that the ELC is to make are Judicial Review or prerogative orders.
11. What is before me is a Judicial Review application. It is a continuation process of the enforcement of a decree of an ELC Chief Magistrate’s Court.
12. Article 165(5) (b) of the Constitution expressly bars this court from hearing and determining disputes which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the superior courts established under Article 162 (2) of the Constitution and the Supreme Court.
13. That being the case, I find and hold that this Court is devoid of any jurisdiction to hear and determine the application herein.
14. The application dated 20th December 2023 be and is hereby struck out for want of jurisdiction.
15. The applicant’s counsel to be notified via email.
16. This Ruling to be typed forthwith.
17. File is closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 15THDAY OF JANUARY, 2024R. E. ABURILIJUDGE