[2024] KEHC 2727 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called seven witnesses, had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. The evidence presented met the threshold required under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that if,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 2727 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Robert Kiprotich Langat; Defendant: Daudi Kiplangat Koech
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E026 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case After Prosecution Evidence
- Outcome
- Both accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are placed on their defence.
- Judges
- HI Ong'udi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Robert Kiprotich Langat
Defendant
Daudi Kiplangat Koech
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case After Prosecution Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being placed on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called seven witnesses, had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. The evidence presented met the threshold required under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates that if, at the close of the prosecution's case, a prima facie case is made out, the accused must be put on their defence. The court was satisfied that the prosecution's case was strong enough to require the accused to answer to the charge, and therefore both accused persons were placed on their defence.
Court Disposition
Both accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are placed on their defence.
Orders
- Both accused persons are placed on their defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Republic v Langat & another (Criminal Case E026 of 2020) [2024] KEHC 2727 (KLR) (13 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2727 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Case E026 of 2020
HI Ong'udi, J
March 13, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Robert Kiprotich Langat
1st Accused
Daudi Kiplangat Koech
2nd Accused
Ruling
1. The two accused persons have been charged with the offence of Murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the penal code. A total of seven (7) witnesses have testified and explained to the court what they know about the case.
2. After weighing the evidence adduced and the submissions by both counsel I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established against them by the prosecution.
3. They are both placed on their defence under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 IN OPEN COURT AT NAKURUH. I. ONG’UDIJUDGE