[2021] KEHC 1443 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, Lawrence Juma Marende, was provoked by the persons who accompanied his estranged wife to his house, leading to an unlawful act that caused the death of the deceased without malice aforethought. The court considered the accused's remorse, participation in rehabilitative programs, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1443 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Lawrence Juma Marende
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 51 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to time served; ordered released unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Provocation, Remorse and Rehabilitation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Lawrence Juma Marende
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to further imprisonment or time served for the offence of manslaughter.
- 2 Whether provocation and rehabilitation efforts should mitigate the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, Lawrence Juma Marende, was provoked by the persons who accompanied his estranged wife to his house, leading to an unlawful act that caused the death of the deceased without malice aforethought. The court considered the accused's remorse, participation in rehabilitative programs, and the four years already spent in remand. Given these mitigating factors and the absence of prior criminal history, the court held that the time already served was sufficient punishment for the offence of manslaughter. The court emphasized proportionality in sentencing and the importance of rehabilitation and remorse in determining the appropriate sentence.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to time served; ordered released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Orders
- Lawrence Juma Marende is sentenced to the time already served in remand.
- Lawrence Juma Marende is to be released from custody unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KIAMBU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 51 OF 2017
REPUBLIC......................................................................................PROSECUTOR
VS.
LAWRENCE JUMA MARENDE.........................................................ACCUSED
RULING ON SENTENCE
1. By this Court’s judgment dated 14th October, 2021 this Court found LAWRENCE JUMA MARENDE (Juma)guilty of manslaughter of Joseph Thuo Migwi deceased.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. Jumaadmitted hitting the deceased with a metal bar but in his defence, stated that he acted in self-defence.
3. Jumahad on the material day requested his estranged wife, Susan, to take to his house his sim card. Susan took the sim card but her evidence was that Jumatook her cell phone which he said he would only release on Susan refunding him money he as expended for training of Susan’s niece.
4. Susan seems to have later gone to Juma’shouse with people whom she hoped would assist her to recover her phone from Juma. The court by its judgment hereof made the following finding:-
“I am satisfied that the accused (Juma) was provoked by person or persons who accompanied Susan to recover her phone from the accused. Susan was not candid to say why she needed the deceased and perhaps others to escort her to accused’s house when in fact she did not testify that the accused had previously been violent towards her. Why then did she need to be accompanied? Was it more probable that Susan and the deceased, amongst others, were the aggressors towards the accused?
It is because of the above findings that I find that the accused committed an unlawful act which caused the death of the deceased but the accused did not have malice aforethought.
JUMA’S MITIGATION
5. Juma stated that he has been detained in remand for 5 years, but indeed it is 4 years having been arrested on 16th October, 2017.
6. Juma is remorseful of his action which resulted in the death of deceased. He however stated that his action was due to the provocation by the crowd who accompanied Susan to his house.
7. Juma has during his period of incarceration undertaken in rehabilitative programs that is Peer Counselling Skills Training by an organization called Faraja Discipleship Training by Prison Fellowship Kenya and the program of the Prisoner’s Journey by Prison Fellowship International.
ANALYSIS AND DETERMINAITON
8. I will begin by citing the case NICHOLA MUKALI NDETEI VS. REPUBLIC (2019) eKLR where the court had this to say on sentencing:-
“23. In the caseR VS. SCOTT (2005) NSWCCA 152Howie, GroveandBarr JJstated:-
“There is a fundamental and immutable principle of sentencing that this sentence imposed must ultimately reflect the objective seriousness of the offence committed and there must be a reasonable proportionality between the sentence passed in the circumstances of the crime committed… One of the purposes of punishment is to ensure that an offender is adequately punished…a further purpose of punishment is to denounce the conduct of the offender.”
9. Juma is a first time offender. He is remorseful of committing the offence of manslaughter. He stated that he has taken rehabilitative programs which have assisted him on how to manage stress and anger. He also stated that he has learned the value of human relationships.
10. Bearing in the above and because Juma has been in custody awaiting the conclusion of his trial, I find and hold that he has served time enough in custody and he is in my view adequately punished for the offence he committed. This conclusion is with a view of this Court’s finding that he was provoked to act unlawfully.
11. This Court hereby does hereby sentence Lawrence Juma Marende to the time already served in remand. Accordingly, I order Lawrence Juma Marende to be released from custody unless otherwise lawfully held.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Coram:
Court Assistant: Maurice
For DPP: Mr. Kasyoka
For Accused: Absent
Accused: Present
COURT
RULING delivered virtually.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE