[2022] KEHC 16024 (KLR)
The court found that the accused was suffering from temporary lunacy at the time of the offence, which significantly diminished her culpability. The court also considered her status as a first offender, her genuine remorse, and the fact that she had already spent over four years in custody awaiting trial and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 16024 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ngimoidi Emejen Lowoto
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyahururu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 18 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction for Manslaughter
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to period already served in custody plus one year probation.
- Judges
- CM Kariuki
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Mental Health Defence, Mitigation, First Offender, Probation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ngimoidi Emejen Lowoto
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction for Manslaughter
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should receive a custodial or non-custodial sentence for manslaughter given her mental state at the time of the offence.
- 2 What weight should be given to the accused's status as a first offender, her remorse, and the period already spent in custody.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused was suffering from temporary lunacy at the time of the offence, which significantly diminished her culpability. The court also considered her status as a first offender, her genuine remorse, and the fact that she had already spent over four years in custody awaiting trial and sentencing. In light of these mitigating factors, and guided by the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines, the court determined that a sentence of the period already served in custody, together with a one-year probation period, was appropriate and sufficient to meet the ends of justice. The court concluded that further incarceration was unnecessary given the unique circumstances of...
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to period already served in custody plus one year probation.
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to the period already served in custody.
- The accused shall serve a one-year (12 months) probation period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Republic v Lowoto (Criminal Case 18 of 2018) [2022] KEHC 16024 (KLR) (5 December 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 16024 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nyahururu
Criminal Case 18 of 2018
CM Kariuki, J
December 5, 2022
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Ngimoidi Emejen Lowoto
Accused
Ruling
1. The accused herein was charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code (cap 63) Laws of Kenya.
2. Particulars being that on October 12, 2018, at Kileboi Manyatta, in Samburu North Sub-County within Samburu County murdered, Lorno Emejen
3. She pleaded not guilty, and the matter proceed to trial from 2018 to November 24, 2022, when judgment was delivered whereof she was convicted of a lesser offence of manslaughter.
4. The Accused mitigated after the prosecution confirmed that she is a first offender.
5. However, the Prosecution called for a custodial sentence while the defence mitigated and called for a non-custodial sentence.
6. She was arrested on November 12, 2018 and has been in custody since then for over four (4) years.
7. The court found that she was of temporary lunacy when she did the act, and thus, she did not understand what she did or she did not appreciate it due to a diminished state of mind to do so.
8. The motive and/or malice were completely undiscerned in the circumstances. The victim was her own child whom she cut the throat and wrapped victim in her back, and was carrying her dead, blood dripping as she went to town.
9. She says in her statement she was heading to the hospital. She also cut her older daughter PW 1, who survived as she managed to run and was rescued and survived after being admitted in hospital critical conditions.
10. When the judgment was being delivered, she was crying, saying she did not know what happened and feels bitter if she did that to her children. She has really suffered, according to her, after hearing of the act she did to her children.
11. She is a first offender and repentant remorseful, and extremely sorry for the deed.
12. She seeks a second chance in life as she is now seeking a non-custodial sentence.
13. Some of the factors to consider in sentencing under the Judiciary sentencing policy are;2) Mental illness or impaired functioning of the mind at the time of the commission of the offense, accused being a first offender generally, where a person is said to be a first-time offender the court usually imposes a lesser sentence as opposed to an accused who was a repeat offender, remorsefulness, period one has been in custody inter alia.
14. The court has considered the above factors and the circumstances of this case and arrived at the conclusion that the sentence of the already served period she has been in custody plus a one-year (12 months) probation period will suffice. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT NYAHURURU THIS 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022. CHARLES KARIUKIJUDGE