[2018] KEHC 5444 (KLR)
The court found that, despite the constitutional right to bond, the negative pre-bail report and the reasons advanced by the prosecution constituted compelling reasons to deny the accused bond. The court exercised its discretion to order that the accused remain in custody during trial, prioritizing the interests of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 5444 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Ltenesian Lekupuny
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 48 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
- Outcome
- Bond denied; accused to remain in custody during trial.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Ltenesian Lekupuny
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be granted bond pending trial.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny bond as per the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, despite the constitutional right to bond, the negative pre-bail report and the reasons advanced by the prosecution constituted compelling reasons to deny the accused bond. The court exercised its discretion to order that the accused remain in custody during trial, prioritizing the interests of justice and public safety over the accused's right to liberty in this instance.
Court Disposition
Bond denied; accused to remain in custody during trial.
Orders
- The accused shall conduct his trial while in custody.
- Mention set for 10:10:18 to give date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO. 48 OF 2018
REPUBLIC.................................................DPP
VERSUS
LTENESIAN LEKUPUNY.............ACCUSED
R U L I N G
1. I have considered the application for bond. Which is a constitutional rights.
2. I have also considered the Right of Appeal sworn in opposition thereto. I have also considered the pre bail report which is negative.
3. I am satisfied that there are compelling reasons way not to grant bond to the accused.
4. He shall conduct his trial while on custody. Mention 10:10:18 to give date. Interpreter be paid attendance costs for today.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
16:07:18