[2016] KEHC 6112 (KLR)
The court held that under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, the right to bail is guaranteed unless the State demonstrates compelling reasons to deny it. In this case, the prosecution conceded that there were no compelling reasons to oppose bail. The court found no evidence or argument suggesting the accused...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 6112 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Lucy Sigara
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 5 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- application for bail allowed
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Compelling Reasons, Pretrial Release, Murder Charge
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Lucy Sigara
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder / Ruling on Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the prosecution has demonstrated compelling reasons to deny bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, the right to bail is guaranteed unless the State demonstrates compelling reasons to deny it. In this case, the prosecution conceded that there were no compelling reasons to oppose bail. The court found no evidence or argument suggesting the accused would abscond, interfere with witnesses, or otherwise jeopardize the trial process. Therefore, the accused was entitled to be released on bond pending trial, subject to reasonable conditions to ensure her attendance at future proceedings.
Court Disposition
application for bail allowed
Orders
- The accused may be released on her own bond of Kshs. 500,000 with two sureties of a like amount.
- The sureties shall be approved by the Deputy Registrar of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
Criminal Murder No. 5 Of 2016
REPUBLIC……….PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
LUCY SIGARA.………ACCUSED
RULING
On the 24th February 2016, the accused person herein Lucy Sigara made her first appearance in court. On the 2nd March, 2016 she denied the charge of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence against her are that on the 21st day of February, 2016 at Nyamagwa Sub-location in Sameta Sub-County within Kisii County she murdered Emmanuel Sigara.
As she awaits trial, the accused person’s counsel Mr. Okemwa prays that she may be released on bond. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 an accused person has a “right to be released on bond or bail, on reasonable conditions, pending a charge or trial, unless there are compelling reasons not to be so released.”
What is clear from the provisions of Article 49 (1) (h) (supra) is that unlike under the old constitutional dispensation where an accused person had to show cause why he should be released on bond, it is now the sole responsibility of the State to show cause why an accused person may not be released on bond or bail.
In the instant case, Mr. Otieno the prosecution counsel told the court that according to the information he has received from the Investigation Officer (I.O) in this case, there were no compelling reasons why the accused person herein may not be released on bond or bail.
In considering an application of this nature, the primary factor to be taken into account is whether the accused person shall turn up for trial once she is released on bond. See Sitati J’s holding in the case of Republic –vs- Abel Moranga Nchore- Kisii HCCR Murder No. 137 of 2013(unreported). Whether the accused will turn up for trial is hinged on other factors such as the likelihood of the accused person interfering with witnesses and the risk of the accused absconding. It is the sole duty of the state to prove to the satisfaction of the court that it would be unsafe to release the accused person on bond or bail.
In the instant case, no such reasons have been advanced by the State. I therefore have no reason to deny the accused person the order she seeks.
Accordingly, the application is hereby allowed on the following terms:-
The accused may be released on his own bond of Kshs. 500,000/= (Kenya Shillings Five) with 2 sureties of a like amount. The sureties shall be approved by the DR of this Honourable Court.
Once she is released on bond, she shall appear in court whenever she is required to do so by the Honourable Court until the case is heard and determined or until further orders of this Honourable Court.
In default of (2) above, the bond shall be cancelled immediately and the sureties taken to account.
Mention on 21/04/2016.
Delivered, dated and signed in at Kisii on 22nd day of March, 2016.
W.A. OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Otieno for prosecutor
Mr. Okemwa for accused
Mr. Omwoyo- Court Clerk