[2022] KEHC 16915 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16915 (KLR)

The court found that, upon reviewing the record and having observed the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused person. This finding required the accused to be put on his defence in accordance with the law. The court was satisfied that the evidence presented by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16915 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Simon Ikunza Lusuli
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 11 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Outcome
Accused put on his defence.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case Burden of Proof Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Simon Ikunza Lusuli

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant putting him on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, upon reviewing the record and having observed the witnesses, the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused person. This finding required the accused to be put on his defence in accordance with the law. The court was satisfied that the evidence presented by the prosecution, if believed, could result in a conviction, thus meeting the threshold for a prima facie case as set out in Kenyan criminal procedure and relevant case law.

Court Disposition

Accused put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused person is hereby put on his defence.