Kenya Judgment

High Court

Republic v Maiso [2025] KEHC 18568 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the accused's status as a repeat offender, the nature of the offence, and the pre-sentence report, a non-custodial sentence is inappropriate. The accused is sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment from the date of first presentation to court.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Accused sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment from 30th January, 2019
  • Right of appeal explained

02

Material facts

Parties

Republic

Prosecutor Counsel: Mr. Wakasiaka SC

Edwin Ombui Maiso

Accused Counsel: M/s Ngugi

Amounts and remedies

  • Years of Imprisonment: 15

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The accused is very remorseful, has been in custody for 6 years, has learnt a lot and reformed.
Respondent
The accused is a repeat offender, committed the current offence three years after a suspended sentence, and the community and victim’s family are not ready for him.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 222 of the Penal Code

    A person convicted under section 222 of the Penal Code is liable to imprisonment for life.

  2. 02

    General sentencing principles

    Consideration of pre-sentence report, mitigation, and circumstances of the offence in sentencing.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the accused's status as a repeat offender, the nature of the offence, and the pre-sentence report, a non-custodial sentence is inappropriate. The accused is sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment from the date of first presentation to court.

Obiter and limits

  • The accused’s accomplice, Jeniffer Kwamboka Maroko, died during the proceedings and the case against her was abated.
  • The accused was about 21 years old at the time of the offence and had committed a similar offence when below 18 years.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • Accused sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment from 30th January, 2019
  • Right of appeal explained

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2025] KEHC 18568 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT NAKURU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2019 REPUBLIC ……………………………………………………

PROSECUTOR

VERSUS EDWIN OMBUI MAISO………………………... ………………..ACCUSED

RULING ON SENTENCE 1. Edwin Ombui Maiso was initially charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the penal code. This was in the year 2019.

2. Later, following a plea bargain agreement the charge was reduced to “Accessory after the fact of murder contrary to section 222 of the penal code”. He admitted the charge and facts and was convicted on 29th October, 2025.

3. The court called for a pre-sentencing report which was filed on 27th November, 2025. The accused was found unsuitable for a non-custodial sentence because of his criminal record. The report shows that the accused is a repeat offender.

4. He was convicted of Manslaughter in Kisii HCR Case No. 16 of 2016 where he was sentenced to two (2) years suspended sentence. Secondly there are two Assault cases vide Kisii 1 | P a g e OB/30/5/11/2018 and OB/4/13/12/2018 whose results were unknown. It is clear the community and the victim’s family are still bitter with the accused.

5. In mitigation M/s Ngugi for the accused submitted that the accused is very remorseful. She added that the accused has been in custody for 6 years and has learnt a lot and has even reformed.

6. Mr. Wakasiaka SC opposed a non custodial sentence. Counsel submitted that the accused through a plea bargain was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two (2) years. He committed the current offence three (3) years after the suspended sentence. He mentioned that the administration and the deceased’s family are not ready for him.

7. I have carefully considered the record herein, and in particular the facts of this case, which are terrifying. The accused’s accomplice who was the 2nd accused herein (Jeniffer Kwamboka Maroko) died on 16th September, 2021 and a death Certificate No. 1213766 was produced herein on 25th October, 2021. The case against her was on 26th October, 2021 was marked as abated.

8. It is not disputed that the accused is a repeat offender. He is aged 27 years old. It means he was aged about 21 years old at the time of commission of this offence. He had committed a similar offence when he was below eighteen (18) years. 2 | P a g e 9. From the accused’s conduct and the pre-sentence report it is for his own safety that he is not given a non-custodial sentence for now.

10. One convicted under section 222 of the Penal Code is liable to imprisonment for life.

11. I have considered the mitigation by the defence, submissions by the prosecution, the pre-sentence report, the law and the circumstances under which the offence was committed. I sentence the accused to fifteen (15) years imprisonment. The sentence to run from 30th January, 2019 when he was first presented to court since he was not released on bond. Right of appeal explained.

12. Orders accordingly Delivered, dated and signed this 17th day of December, 2025 in open court at Nakuru. H. I. ONG’UDI

JUDGE 3 | P a g e

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 203

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code section 204

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code section 222

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.